Home blank Reunion Slideshow blank Class of '63 Forums
Committee Pictures Social news

 
George has been notifying former works employees about things that are of importance to them for a number of years now.  We will try to keep the most current things that affect us here as a reference for those to refer to.  Our benefits and legislation actions are of the most important to us right now.
 

  

 

NRLN Agency Offering Quality Insurance Plans for 2012

 The NRLN Agency is continuing to be responsive to NRLN Grassroots Network Members who have stated in NRLN surveys that the NRLN should inform them of health care insurance plans. Through a new website and new partner, Mature Health Center, the NRLN Agency is making access available to premium quotes on 2012 insurance plans for health care, prescription drugs, long-term care, and dental discounts. There are Medicare Supplement Insurance (Medigap) plans and health care plans for pre-age-65 individuals and family members.

Medicare Supplement Insurance (Medigap) plans help pay some of the health care costs that Medicare doesn't cover. A participant in Medicare may change his or her Medigap plan at any time. The enrollment period for a 2012 Medicare Part D prescription drug plan or a Medicare Advantage plan is October 15 to December 7, 2011. Because the federal government is reducing the subsidy that it pays to Medicare Advantage plans, the NRLN Agency has elected not to offer them.

Click here to access the NRLN website at www.nrln.org and click on the "Insurance" tab on the far right near the top of the home page to link to the NRLN Agency insurance website. To speak with a Mature Health Center designated representative, call toll free at 1-877-631-2843. Tell the representative that you are a member of the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN).  You may also send an email with your questions to Mature Health Center at kori@maturehealthcenter.com .

The NRLN Agency is governed by five NRLN Board Members. The NRLN does not fund or financially support Agency operations with retiree association or individual dues. The Agency may receive market access fees that flow directly to the NRLN as contributions that support you.

In order to protect you from receiving insurance company nusance mail, the NRLN Agency has final approval authority of materials and in-house control over the printing and mailing of materials you may receive from Mature Health Center and our mailing list will not be made available to them.

Check out the website and get your questions answered. Any information submitted to obtain a quote will be kept private. If you have feedback for the NRLN Agency, send it to nrlnmessage@msn.com .

NRLN Agency Board

 

NRLN Action Alert

"Super Committee" And Congress Must Protect Retirees

 

You may have read my NRLN President's Forum message sent to you on October 8th in which I asked you to read a copy of my letter to each of the 12 members of the Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, the so-called "Super Committee." I have received a number of emails from NRLN Grassroots Network Members saying they agree with the NRLN's proposals stated in the five-page letter.

 

Now, your help is needed to inform all members of Congress about some of the key points in the NRLN's letter. I am asking you to send the NRLN's sample letter (copy below) to your Representative and Senators. 

  • Click here to access the NRLN Action Alert. Look for the Action Alert headline: "SUPER COMMITTEE" AND CONGRESS MUST PROTECT RETIREES. Then click on the "Take Action" button. On the next screen, type in your zip code and click "GO" to identify your elected representatives and access the sample letter to email to Washington. 
  •  If you have a problem accessing the Action Alert with the above link, go to www.nrln.org and click on the "Take Action Now" link near the top of the NRLN home page.
  •  It would also help to print out a copy of the letter to the "Super Committee" from the NRLN website and take it to your Representative's and Senators' local/area office. Click here to access the letter. Adobe® Reader® is required to view and print out the newsletter. If you do not have this software on your computer, click here to download it free.Call the local/area office and request an appointment with the lawmaker, if possible, or a senior staff member. Click here to access the NRLN website to find your Representative's and Senators' office locations and phone numbers.  

If your Representative or Senator is one of the members of the "Super Committee" it is especially important that you email the NRLN's sample letter and take the five-page letter to his or her office. The members of the "Super Committee" are: Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) Democratic Co-Chair, Max Baucus (D-MT), John Kerry (D-MA), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Rob Portman (R-OH), and Pat Toomey (R-PA); and Representatives Jeb Hensarling (R-TX-05), Republican Co-Chair, Dave Camp (R-MI-04), Fred Upton (R-MI-06), Xavier Becerra (D-CA-31), James Clyburn (D-SC-06), and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD-08).

 

Bill Kadereit, President

National Retiree Legislative Network

 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 

Sample Letter:

 

Dear Representative _____________: or Dear Senator ____________:

 

As one of your constituents, I am writing to you about the work of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. On October 5th, Bill Kadereit, President of the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN) faxed to each member of the "Super Committee" a five-page letter urging them to protect Social Security and Medicare and reduce the federal deficit by enacting legislation to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.

 

I want to let you know that I support the NRLN's positions and through this letter I am sharing with you some of the NRLN's key points. I urge you to read the entire NRLN letter to the "Super Committee" members. It is posted on the NRLN website at: http://www.nrln.org/BKLETTERS/NRLN%20Ltr%20Super%20Committee%20All%20Members.pdf . Ask your colleagues on the "Super Committee" to support the NRLN's proposals.

 

Social Security and Medicare are not welfare programs. My employer and I paid payroll taxes to earn these benefits for my retirement years. It galls me when I hear members of Congress call them "entitlements." Social Security and Medicare are covenants with Americans and the benefits must be protected and not reduced by possible recommendations from the "Super Committee" that must be voted on by all members of Congress.

 

Social Security and Medicare did not cause the federal budget deficit. The real issue is that rising costs in areas such as prescription drugs and wasteful, unnecessary programs in other areas of the federal budget have inflated the nation's deficit. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported in August 2011 that Social Security and Medicare combined account for less than $50 billion of the projected $1.3 trillion deficit in 2011. These figures do not point to Social Security and Medicare as the real culprits in the deficit crisis.

 

I am asking that you support the following NRLN proposals and urge your colleagues on the "Super Committee" to do likewise:

 

On Social Security: 

  • Close the Social Security long-range funding gap through modest increases in the payroll tax rate and increasing the cap on maximum wages subject to the tax, which is currently $106,800 a year.
  •  Don't change the way the annual Cost-Of-Living Adjustment (COLA) is calculated for Social Security. Switching to the proposed Chained Consumer Price Index (CPI) would be a deceptive way to reduce benefits because retirees have higher health care costs than other Americans.
  •  Don't increase the age for Social Security eligibility and full benefits. A higher Social Security retirement age will require Americans to attempt to remain employed when private sector employers favor younger rather than older workers.
  •  Make the Social Security Trust Fund a "lockbox" to prevent Congress from spending the payroll tax dollars for other purposes.

 

On Medicare:  

  • Avoid any reductions in Medicare benefits that could negatively impact the care that current and future retirees receive from doctors, hospitals and other health care services. Medicare benefits have become a fundamental financial security program for assisting seniors with their health care.
  • Make prosecution of Medicare fraud a high priority with prison time for those convicted. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) estimates that $48 billion of Medicare’s total outlays went to improper payments, including fraudulent ones.
  • Set fair and equitable rate formulae for determining physician fees and make adjustments up or down annually. Examine costly referrals and redundant visit practices and disallow them. 
  • Congress must increase the Medicare tax on workers and employers until such time as taxes can again fund 60% to 65% of the Medicare budget 
  • Pass legislation that would compel safe importation, competitive bidding, funding to accelerate generic drug sales and eliminate non-competitive practices in the prescription drug industry. Research by the NRLN indicates that if Congress acts to implement these initiatives, the nation’s $4,060 billion in projected prescription drug expenditures over the next ten years can be reduced by 18%. This 18% savings would amount to $730 billion.
  •  Pass these bills to reduce the cost of Medicare, the budget deficit and lower the cost of prescription drugs for Americans:  

S. 319: Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act of 2011

 

S. 44: Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act of 2011 and H.R. 2248: Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act of 2011

 

S. 27: Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act of 2011

  • Encourage your colleagues in the House to introduce companion bills for S. 319 and S. 27.

The "Super Committee" and the entire Congress have an opportunity to safeguard the covenant with current and future retirees. Do what is right to protect retirement financial security.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

 

Insights Into New Health Care Law
September 2010

I enjoy reading the various Retiree Association newsletters that I receive.  When reading the latest newsletter from the Association of US West Retirees Colorado/Wyoming group, I was impressed by a column written by Barbara Wilcox.  The column responded to questions from US West/Qwest retirees about the new national health care law.

I've met Barbara at AUSWR meetings and know she is an experienced researcher.  I called Barbara and received her approval to share her column with NRLN Grassroots Network members through an email and by posting it on the NRLN website at www.nrln.org . I think you will see below that the questions from US West/Qwest retirees are similar to questions that many other NRLN Grassroots Network members have about the new health care law. I think many of you will be interested in Barbara's answers.

The references to Qwest were changed to the word "Company" so that you might more readily identify with the questions and answers for your own personal situation regarding the new health care law.

I also asked Barbara if she would consider researching answers to questions from NRLN Grassroots Network members that I could periodically share with NRLN email "subscribers."  Although Barbara is very busy with a number of volunteer projects, she said she would search out answers as her time permits.  If you have questions about the new health care law, send them to nrlnmessage@msn.com .  Don't expect an immediate personal response. The NRLN will gather the questions and group those that are similar before forwarding them to Barbara.  Barbara will include these NRLN questions in her future columns, as appropriate.

At the end of Barbara's column, I inserted the health care law implementation timeline from the Kaiser Foundation website. At the very end, Barbara has listed a number of websites that are good resources for information about the health care law.  If you don't find the answer to your questions on one of those websites, send your questions to the NRLN.

Bill Kadereit, President, National Retiree Legislative Network  

-------------------------------------------------

National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN)

A Review of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Act of 2010

By Barbara Wilcox, Association of U.S. West Retirees (AUSWR)– NRLN Association

The Q’s and A’s and other information provided below were developed to provide information on changes that potentially impact us as retirees, as a result of passage of The Patient Protection and Affordable Health Act (PPAHA) of 2010.  Comments are made with references to current insurance coverage but company plans are subject to change at annual enrollment time.

This review includes the Q’s and A’s followed by the detailed PPAHA timeline as published by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Also, several useful sources are recommended at the end of this review.

IMPACT OF HEALTH CARE LAW:

General:

Q-1. What changes might the new law make in the health care benefits Companies provide retirees?

A. The new law makes no changes in what Companies are required to provide to retirees.

Q-2. But, I thought the new law required large employers to either cover the people who work for them or pay a penalty.

A. YES, that’s true for active employees. But, the new law makes NO requirement that employers cover retirees. 

You Are Not on Medicare Yet:

Q-3. I’m a retiree, but I’m not yet 65, so I’m not eligible for Medicare. My Company is providing my health care. Is there anything in the new law that benefits me?

A. YES. There is a temporary reinsurance program for retirees age 55-64. The Federal Government will begin subsidizing the costs of the health care claims filed under your Company-provided health insurance by paying 80% of costs between $15,000 and $90,000. This subsidy is supposed to reduce your costs and it will also reduce company costs. Because of the cost reduction, this is a significant incentive for Companies to continue to provide your health insurance. Once the new Health Insurance Exchanges are operating, in 2014, this subsidy ends, and retirees in your situation will be able to purchase insurance on the Exchange if they choose to do so.

You Are On Medicare:

Q-4. I’m on Medicare. Will the new law make changes for me?

A. YES. It depends on whether you are on traditional Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan exactly what changes you may experience.

Q-5. How do I know which kind of Medicare I’m on? I just chose from the options my Company gave me at open enrollment.

A. If you were with a HMO (Health Maintenance Organization), you most likely enrolled in that HMO’s Medicare Advantage plan when you became eligible for Medicare. Companies may offer different HMOs in different geographical locations. If you are not in one of these HMOs, you probably have traditional Medicare.

Traditional Medicare Changes:

Q-6. I’m on traditional Medicare. Will I have changes?

A. YES. There are several enhancements being made to traditional Medicare. A number of preventive services, such as annual physicals, mammograms, colonoscopies, will be covered free of charge, beginning 1/1/2011. There will be new programs to provide coordination of care if you are hospitalized or have a chronic condition. Reimbursements to primary care doctors and general surgeons will be increased by 10% for five years, so there should be more of these doctors for you to choose from.

Medicare Advantage Plan Changes:

Q-7. I’ve heard that Medicare Advantage plans will go away, or will get more expensive. Is this true?

A.  NO & MAYBE. The Medicare Advantage program is not going away. Up until now, these plans have enjoyed a larger subsidy from the Federal government than traditional Medicare, and that will be phased-down to equal the subsidy to traditional Medicare. The private companies that offer Medicare Advantage may make changes as a result. For example, they may take away some of the perks they’ve offered in the past, such as health club memberships. They may also charge higher premiums or co-pays, but that is nothing new. These plans are required to offer benefits at least as good as traditional Medicare.

Tricare for Veterans:

Q-8. I am a veteran and am on Tricare. Will there be any changes for me?

A. NO. Defense Secretary Gates has issued a statement saying that Tricare meets all of the requirements of the new health care law.

FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE LAW:

Q-9. Is it true that money is being taken from Medicare to pay for covering the uninsured?

A. The new law contains a provision requiring that any savings in Medicare go to reduce patient costs, improve Medicare benefits, protect patients’ access to providers (doctors) and extend solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund. In 2011-2013, money is being taken from the Medicare Advantage programs until the Federal subsidies of that program are matched to subsidies of traditional Medicare. This money, along with other Medicare savings, will be used to enhance basic Medicare benefits and extend the life of Medicare. Overall, the solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund will be extended by nearly a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. But, since some of the money won’t be needed until later years, it will be “loaned” via special Treasury bills to pay for Non-Medicare expenses, such as coverage for the uninsured.

Q-10. Large companies, such as AT&T, Deere & Co., and Verizon, announced in March that they may cut prescription drug coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees because their federal subsidy from the Medicare Part D program will no longer be tax-free. Will this tax change affect the prescription drug benefits of my Companies retirees?

A. Since the Medicare D prescription drug program was started in 2006, employers have been given a 28% tax free subsidy to encourage them to provide prescription drug coverage to their Medicare eligible employees and retirees. Some Companies reported the future loss of the tax benefit on the subsidy in  first quarter financial results, which indicates that they will continue to provide the Medicare prescription drug coverage. Employers will still get the 28% subsidy, but it will no longer be tax-free. Still the subsidy is a good incentive for Companies to keep the prescription drug coverage. None of us can predict what our Companies will do. But, it seems unlikely that this tax change would cause most Companies to drop prescription drug coverage.

Q-11. I’ve heard that “Cadillac” health plans are going to be taxed. Will that apply to the health care insurance we retirees get from our Companies?

A. It will not apply to those of us who are on Medicare, because most Companies only supplement our Medicare coverage. For those not yet on Medicare in 2018, when the tax on high value plans begins, it will depend on what your insurance premium level is (retiree plus Company cost, not including dental insurance).  The threshold for persons over 55 will be $11,850 annually for single coverage and $30,950 for a family.

Q-12. Are there any other new taxes that are likely to hit retirees?

A. That depends on your individual circumstances and income levels. For individuals with adjusted gross income over $200,000 or $250,000 for couples, a 3.8% Medicare tax will be assessed on investment income. For those at this income level who are still working, there also will be an additional 0.9% payroll tax. These taxes begin in 2013.

Q-13. What are the changes in the way deductions can be taken for health care expenses?

A. In 2013, the threshold for itemized deductions of out-of-pocket medical expenses will increase from 7.5% of adjusted gross income to 10%. For those 65 and older, this increase is postponed until 2017.

The Truth About Some Myths:

Q-14. I received an email saying that we would have to pay income tax on the value of my Company-provided health insurance. Is this true?

A. NO. There is confusion, because the Affordable Care Act does require that employers begin reporting the value of the health insurance they provide on employees’ W-2 forms. But individuals do not pay income taxes on that value. Health insurance could be taxed in the future if the value exceeds certain limits, but the insurance Company will pay the tax, not the insured person. (See discussion of Cadillac plans in Q-11.)

Q-15. I heard that the health care reform law has a new real estate tax in it. They’re saying that, if I sell my home, I’ll have to pay a 3.8% sales tax. Is this true?

A. NO. There is no real estate or sales tax in the Affordable Care Act. There is a 3.8% income tax on investment income beginning in 2013, but only for individuals earning more than $200,000 or couples earning more than $250,000. So, if you fall in that high income bracket, and you sell your house, you might have to pay the 3.8% tax, on any gain you made over and above the cost of the house, depending on other details in your earnings.

RULEMAKING:

The Federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is conducting rule-making procedures to set the specifics of how each provision of the new law will be implemented.

New Rules for Medicare:

Q-16. What new benefits are added to Medicare in 2011?

A. As of January 1, 2011, Medicare will cover many preventive services at no expense to the patient, including annual wellness visits with your primary care physician.

Q-17. What other changes are happening in Medicare next January?

A. Rules have been issued for providing increased payment to primary care doctors and surgeons.

New Rules for Grandfathered Plans:

Q-18. Is the health insurance we get from our Company considered to be grandfathered, under the new law?

A. YES, right now it is an existing, grandfathered plan.

Q-19. As a grandfathered plan, will our insurance have to make any changes under the new law?

A. YES. The Affordable Care Act does make certain requirements of all health insurance plans, regardless of whether they are existing plans or new plans. These rules are known as the Patients’ Bill of Rights, which takes effect for plan years beginning after Sept. 23, 2010. Depending on the exact plan you are on, here are some key provisions that may cause improvements in your insurance:

  • No lifetime limits on coverage.
  • Phase out of annual dollar-amount limits on coverage.
  • Extension of parents’ coverage of young adults up to age 26.

Q-20. Will a Company-provided insurance always be grandfathered?

A. The rules list a number of changes to a plan that would cause it to lose grandfathered status. For example, the plan cannot significantly cut or reduce benefits or increase deductibles or co-pays beyond specified amounts.  Neither can the employer offering the plan tighten or decrease its cap on the amount of premium the employer pays.

Q-21. If my Company-provided insurance should lose its grandfathered status, what happens?

A. Then the Company would have to meet additional requirements that any new plan has to meet. For example, they would have to provide specified preventive care at no cost to you.

National Healthcare Reform Implementation Timeline

This Kaiser Family Foundation implementation timeline reflects the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which President Obama signed on March 23, 2010, as well as provisions in the Health Care & Education Reconciliation Act, which was signed on March 30, 2010. Major provisions of the acts will be implemented during the 2010 – 2014 but a few important provisions are scheduled to take effect in 2015 or later.

2010

Insurance Reforms

  • Establish a temporary national high-risk pool to provide health coverage to individuals with pre-existing medical conditions. (Effective 90 days following enactment until January 1, 2014)
  • Provide dependent coverage for adult children up to age 26 for all individual and group policies.
  • Prohibit individual and group health plans from placing lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage and prior to 2014, plans may only impose annual limits on coverage as determined by the Secretary. Prohibit insurers from rescinding coverage except in cases of fraud and prohibit pre-existing condition exclusions for children.
  • Require qualified health plans to provide at a minimum coverage without cost-sharing for preventive services rated A or B by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, recommended immunizations, preventive care for infants, children, and adolescents, and additional preventive care and screenings for women.
  • Provide tax credits to small employers with no more than 25 employees and average annual wages of less than $50,000 that purchase health insurance for employees.
  • Create a temporary reinsurance program for employers providing health insurance coverage to retirees over age 55 who are not eligible for Medicare. (Effective 90 days following enactment until January 1, 2014)
  • Require health plans to report the proportion of premium dollars spent on clinical services, quality, and other costs and provide rebates to consumers for the amount of the premium spent on clinical services and quality that is less than 85% for plans in the large group market and 80% for plans in the individual and small group markets. (Requirement to report medical loss ratio effective plan year 2010; requirement to provide rebates effective January 1, 2011)
  • Establish a process for reviewing increases in health plan premiums and require plans to justify increases. Require states to report on trends in premium increases and recommend whether certain plan should be excluded from the Exchange based on unjustified premium increases.

Medicare

  • Provide a $250 rebate to Medicare beneficiaries who reach the Part D coverage gap in 2010 and gradually eliminate the Medicare Part D coverage gap by 2020.
  • Expand Medicare coverage to individuals who have been exposed to environmental health hazards from living in an area subject to an emergency declaration made as of June 17, 2009 and have developed certain health conditions as a result.
  • Improve care coordination for dual eligibles by creating a new office within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services, the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office.
  • Reduce annual market basket updates for inpatient and outpatient hospital services, long-term care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and psychiatric hospitals and units.
  • Ban new physician-owned hospitals in Medicare, requiring hospitals to have a provider agreement in effect by December 31; limit the growth of certain grandfathered physician-owned hospitals. 

Medicaid

  • Create a state option to cover childless adults though a Medicaid state plan amendment.
  • Create a state option to provide Medicaid coverage for family planning services up to the highest level of eligibility for pregnant women to certain low-income individuals through a Medicaid state plan amendment.
  • Create a new option for states to provide Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage to children of state employees eligible for health benefits if certain conditions are met.
  • Increase the Medicaid drug rebate percentage for brand name drugs to 23.1% (except the rebate for clotting factors and drugs approved exclusively for pediatric use increases to 17.1%); increase the Medicaid rebate for non-innovator, multiple source drugs to 13% of average manufacturer price; and extend the drug rebate to Medicaid managed care plans.
  • Provide funding for and expand the role of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission to include assessments of adult services (including those dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid). 
  • Require the Secretary of HHS to issue regulations to establish a process for public notice and comment for section 1115 waivers in Medicaid and CHIP.

Prescription Drugs

  • Authorize the Food and Drug Administration to approve generic versions of biologic drugs and grant biologics manufacturers 12 years of exclusive use before generics can be developed.

Quality Improvement

  • Support comparative effectiveness research by establishing a non-profit Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
  • Establish a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of a national emergency.
  • Reauthorize and amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act.

Workforce

  • Establish the Workforce Advisory Committee to develop a national workforce strategy.
  • Increase workforce supply and support training of health professionals through scholarships and loans.

Tax Changes

  • Impose additional requirements on non-profit hospitals. Impose a tax of $50,000 per year for failure to meet these requirements.
  • Limit the deductibility of executive and employee compensation to $500,000 per applicable individual for health insurance providers.
  • Impose a tax of 10% on the amount paid for indoor tanning services.
  • Exclude unprocessed fuels from the definition of cellulosic biofuel for purposes of applying the cellulosic biofuel producer credit.
  • Clarify application of the economic substance doctrine and increase penalties for underpayments attributable to a transaction lacking economic substance.

2011

 Long-term Care

  • Establish a national, voluntary insurance program for purchasing community living assistance services and supports (CLASS program).

Medical Malpractice

  • Award five-year demonstration grants to states to develop, implement, and evaluate alternatives to current tort litigations.

Prevention/Wellness

  • Eliminate cost-sharing for Medicare covered preventive services that are recommended (rated A or B) by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and waive the Medicare deductible for colorectal cancer screening tests. Authorize the Secretary to modify or eliminate Medicare coverage of preventive services based on recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
  • Provide Medicare beneficiaries access to a comprehensive health risk assessment and creation of a personalized prevention plan and provide incentives to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries to complete behavior modification programs.
  • Provide grants for up to five years to small employers that establish wellness programs.
  • Establish the National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council to develop a national strategy to improve the nation's health.
  • Require chain restaurants and food sold from vending machines to disclose the nutritional content of each item.

Medicare

  • Require pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide a 50% discount on brand-name prescriptions filled in the Medicare Part D coverage gap beginning in 2011 and begin phasing-in federal subsidies for generic prescriptions filled in the Medicare Part D  coverage gap.
  • Provide 10% Medicare bonus pay to primary care physicians, and general surgeons practicing in health professional shortage areas. (Effective 2011 through 2015)
  • Restructure payments to Medicare Advantage plans by setting payments to different percentages of Medicare fee-for-service rates.
  • Prohibit Medicare Advantage plans from imposing higher cost-sharing requirements for some Medicare covered benefits than is required under the traditional fee-for-service program.
  • Provide Medicare payments to qualifying hospitals in counties with the lowest quartile Medicare spending for 2011 and 2012.
  • Freeze the income threshold for income-related Medicare Part B premiums for 2011 through 2019 at 2010 levels, and reduce the Medicare Part D premium subsidy for those with incomes above $85,000/individual and $170,000/couple. 
  • Create an Innovation Center within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Medicaid

  • Prohibit federal payments for Medicaid services related to health care acquired conditions.
  • Create a new Medicaid state plan option to permit Medicaid to states enrollees with at least two chronic conditions, one condition and risk of developing another, or at least one serious and persistent mental health condition to designate a provider as a health home. Provide states taking up the option with 90% FMAP for two years for health home related services including care management, care coordination and health promotion.
  • Create the State Balancing Incentive Program in Medicaid to provide enhanced federal matching payments to increase non-institutionally based long-term care services.
  • Establish the Community First Choice Option in Medicaid to provide community-based attendant support services to certain people with disabilities.

Quality Improvement

  • Develop a national quality improvement strategy that includes priorities to improve the delivery of health care services, patient health outcomes, and population health.
  • Establish the Community-based Collaborative Care Network Program to support consortiums of health care providers to coordinate and integrate health care services, for low-income uninsured and underinsured populations.
  • Establish a new trauma center program to strengthen emergency department and trauma center capacity.
  • Improve access to care by increasing funding by $11 billion for community health centers and by $1.5 billion for the National Health Service Corps over five years; establish new programs to support school-based health centers and nurse-managed health clinics.

Workforce

  • Establish Teaching Health Centers to provide payments for primary care residency programs in community-based ambulatory patient care centers.

Tax Changes

  • Exclude the costs for over-the-counter drugs not prescribed by a doctor from being reimbursed through a health reimbursement account or health flexible spending account and from being reimbursed on a tax-free basis through a health savings account or Archer medical savings account.
  • Increase the tax on distributions from a health savings account or an Archer MSA that are not used for qualified medical expenses to 20% of the disbursed amount. 
  • Impose new annual fees on the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector.

2012

 Medicare

  • Make Part D cost-sharing for full-benefit dual eligible beneficiaries receiving home and community-based care services equal to the cost-sharing for those who receive institutional care.
  • Allows providers to organize as accountable care organizations (ACOs) that voluntarily meet quality thresholds to share in the cost savings they achieve for the Medicare program.
  • Reduce Medicare payments that would otherwise be made to hospitals by specified percentages to account for excess (preventable) hospital readmissions.
  • Reduce annual market basket updates for home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, hospices, and other Medicare providers.
  • Create the Medicare Independence at Home demonstration program.
  • Establish a hospital value-based purchasing program in Medicare and develop plans to implement value-based purchasing programs for skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and ambulatory surgical centers.
  • Provide bonus payments to high-quality Medicare Advantage plans. 
  • Reduce rebates for Medicare Advantage plans.

Medicaid

  • Create new demonstration projects in Medicaid to pay bundled payments for episodes of care that include hospitalizations (effective January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016); to make global capital payments to safety net hospital systems (effective fiscal years 2010 through 2012); to allow pediatric medical providers organized as accountable care organizations to share in cost-savings (effective January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016); and to provide Medicaid payments to institutions of mental disease for adult enrollees who require stabilization of an emergency condition (effective October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015).

Quality Improvement

  • Require enhanced collection and reporting of data on race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, disability status, and for underserved rural and frontier populations.

2013

Insurance Reforms

  • Create the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) program to foster the creation of non-profit, member-run health insurance companies in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to offer qualified health plans. (Appropriate $6 billion to finance the program and award loans and grants to establish CO-OPs by July 1, 2013.)
  • Simplify health insurance administration by adopting a single set of operating rules for eligibility verification and claims status (rules adopted July 1, 2011; effective January 1, 2013), electronic funds transfers and health care payment and remittance (rules adopted July 1, 2012; effective January 1, 2014), and health claims or equivalent encounter information, enrollment and disenrollment in a health plan, health plan premium payments, and referral certification and authorization (rules adopted July 1, 2014; effective January 1, 2016). Health plans must document compliance with these standards or face a penalty of no more than $1 per covered life. (Effective April 1, 2014.)

Prevention/Wellness

  • Provide states that offer Medicaid coverage of and remove cost-sharing for preventive services recommended (rated A or B) by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and recommended immunizations with a one percentage point increase in the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for these services.

Medicare

  • Begin phasing-in federal subsidies for brand-name prescriptions filled in the Medicare Part D coverage gap (to 25% in 2020, in addition to the 50% manufacturer brand-name discount).
  • Establish a national Medicare pilot program to develop and evaluate paying a bundled payment for acute, inpatient hospital services, physician services, outpatient hospital services, and post-acute care services for an episode of care.

Medicaid

  • Increase Medicaid payments for primary care services provided by primary care doctors for 2013 and 2014 with 100% federal funding.

Quality Improvement

  • Require disclosure of financial relationships between health entities, including physicians, hospitals, pharmacists, other providers, and manufacturers and distributors of covered drugs, devices, biological, and medical supplies.

Tax Changes

  • Increase the threshold for the itemized deduction for unreimbursed medical expenses from 7.5% of adjusted gross income to 10% of adjusted gross income for regular tax purposes; waives increase for individuals age 65 and older for tax years 2013-2016.
  • Increase the Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) tax rate on wages by 0.9% (from 1.45% to 2.35%) on earnings over $200,000 for individual taxpayers and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly and impose a 3.8% assessment on unearned income for higher-income taxpayers.
  • Limit the amount of contributions to a flexible spending account for medical expenses to $2,500 per year increased annually by the cost of living adjustment.
  • Impose an excise tax of 2.3% on the sale of any taxable medical device.
  • Eliminate the tax-deduction for employers who receive Medicare Part D retiree drug subsidy payments.

2014

Individual and Employer Requirements

  • Require U.S. citizens and legal residents to have qualifying health coverage (phase-in tax penalty for those without coverage).
  • Assess employers with 50 or more employees that do not offer coverage and have at least one full-time employee who receives a premium tax credit a fee of $2,000 per full-time employee, excluding the first 30 employees from the assessment.  Employers with 50 or more employees that offer coverage but have at least one full-time employee receiving a premium tax credit, will pay the lesser of $3,000 for each employee receiving a premium credit or $2,000 for each full-time employee, excluding the first 30 employees from the assessment. Require employers with more than 200 employees to automatically enroll employees into health insurance plans offered by the employer.  Employees may opt out of coverage.

Insurance Reforms

  • Create state-based American Health Benefit Exchanges and Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Exchanges, administered by a governmental agency or non-profit organization, through which individuals and small businesses with up to 100 employees can purchase qualified coverage.
  • Require guarantee issue and renewability and allow rating variation based only on age (limited to 3 to 1 ratio), premium rating area, family composition, and tobacco use (limited to 1.5. to 1 ratio) in the individual and the small group market and the Exchanges.
  • Reduce the out-of-pocket limits for those with incomes up to 400% FPL to the following levels:
    • 100-200% FPL: one-third of the HSA limits ($1,983/individual and $3,967/family in 2010);
    • 200-300% FPL: one-half of the HSA limits ($2,975/individual and $5,950/family in 2010);
    • 300-400% FPL: two-thirds of the HSA limits ($3,987/individual and $7,973/family in 2010).
  • Limit deductibles for health plans in the small group market to $2,000 for individuals and $4,000 for families unless contributions are offered that offset deductible amounts above these limits.
  • Limit any waiting periods for coverage to 90 days. 
  • Create an essential health benefits package that provides a comprehensive set of services, covers at least 60% of the actuarial value of the covered benefits, limits annual cost-sharing to the current law HSA limits ($5,950/individual and $11,900/family in 2010), and is not more extensive than the typical employer plan.
  • Require the Office of Personnel Management to contract with insurers to offer at least two multi-state plans in each Exchange. At least one plan must be offered by a non-profit entity and at least one plan must not provide coverage for abortions beyond those permitted by federal law.
  • Permit states the option to create a Basic Health Plan for uninsured individuals with incomes between 133-200% FPL who would otherwise be eligible to receive premium subsidies in the Exchange.
  • Allow states the option of merging the individual and small group markets.
  • Create a temporary reinsurance program to collect payments from health insurers in the individual and group markets to provide payments to plans in the individual market that cover high-risk individuals.
  • Require qualified health plans to meet new operating standards and reporting requirements.

Premium Subsidies

  • Provide refundable and advanceable premium credits and cost sharing subsidies to eligible individuals and families with incomes between 133-400% FPL to purchase insurance through the Exchanges.

Medicare

  • Reduce the out-of-pocket amount that qualifies an enrollee for catastrophic coverage in Medicare Part D (effective through 2019).
  • Establish an Independent Payment Advisory Board comprised of 15 members to submit legislative proposals containing recommendations to reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending if spending exceeds a target growth rate.
  • Reduce Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments initially by 75% and subsequently increase payments based on the percent of the population uninsured and the amount of uncompensated care provided. Require Medicare Advantage plans to have medical loss ratios no lower than 85%.

Medicaid

  • Expand Medicaid to all non-Medicare eligible individuals under age 65 (children, pregnant women, parents, and adults without dependent children) with incomes up to 133% FPL based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) and provide enhanced federal matching for new eligibles.
  • Reduce states' Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) allotments.
  • Increase spending caps for the territories.

Prevention/Wellness

  • Permit employers to offer employees rewards of up to 30%, increasing to 50% if appropriate, of the cost of coverage for participating in a wellness program and meeting certain health-related standards. Establish 10-state pilot programs to permit participating states to apply similar rewards for participating in wellness programs in the individual market.

Tax Changes

  • Impose fees on the health insurance sector.

2015 and later

Insurance Reforms

  • Permit states to form health care choice compacts and allow insurers to sell policies in any state participating in the compact. (Compacts take effect January 1, 2016.)

Medicare

  • Reduce Medicare payments to certain hospitals for hospital-acquired conditions by 1%. (Effective fiscal year 2015.)

Tax Changes

Impose an excise tax on insurers of employer-sponsored health plans with aggregate values that exceed $10,200 for individual coverage and $27,500 for family coverage. (Effective January 1, 2018)

 

To read the full text of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, H.R. 3590: go to http://thomas.gov and check Bill Number, then enter H.R. 3590 and click Search.

For more information about the new health reform law, the following sources are recommended:

 


Need Remains to Cut Prescription Drug Costs

 

As most people enrolled in Medicare know, Medicare Part D provides prescription drug benefits to Americans on Medicare. The standard Medicare Plan D benefit comes with a $310 deductible.  After you've spent $310, you pay 25% of the cost of your prescriptions until the total cost of all the medicine you have received in a year hits $2,830. Then, you are stuck with 100% of the bill until the total cost of your medicines hits $6,440. The gap when Medicare does not cover the cost of your prescription drugs is known as the "donut hole."

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare Part D participants who reach the prescription drug "donut hole" in 2010 will receive a $250 rebate with the checks starting to go out June 15, 2010. There's no application process and no private company will be involved in getting your rebate check to you if you are eligible.

Beginning in 2011, seniors in the "donut hole" will receive a 50% discount on prescription drugs.  By 2015, you will be responsible for 45% of the cost; by 2018, your share will be reduced to 35%.  For generic drugs, your costs will be reduced 7% each year, beginning in 2011. In 2015, you will pay 65% of the cost of generic drugs; by 2018, you will pay 44%. Medicare's share of costs will increase so that the "donut hole" will be completely closed in 2020.

While the NRLN did not support or oppose all elements of the new health care reform law, we did and still do advocate closing the "donut hole."  But closing the "donut hole" s is not a solution for getting ever-escalating prescription drug costs under control for retirees and other Americans. We endorsed and lobbied for proposed changes to enhance global competition and to eliminate what are known to be non-competitive practices. Proposals were actually included in the reform bills but did not survive prescription drug and insurance industry lobbyists who spent hundreds of millions of dollars to defeat progress.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summer NRLN Newsletter Highlights Importance of Grassroots Network

        You are invited to read the NRLN FOCUS Newsletter Summer 2010 edition on the NRLN website at: http://www.nrln.org/Newsletters/NRLN%20FOCUS%20SUMMER%202010%20V2%20.pdf

        Attention is given to the need for NRLN Grassroots Network members to take the initiative to communicate with their members of Congress.  I write in my column that it is your willingness to take action as a Grassroots Network member that in large measure determines how successful the NRLN can be in influencing members of Congress.

        An article asks Grassroots Network members to use a special webpage for a preliminary show of interest in whether you would participate in the NRLN's Washington, DC Fly-In on September 13 and 14 to meet with lawmakers and staff members on Capitol Hill.

        Bob Martina, NRLN Vice President - Grassroots Network, announces in his column the availability of an "Activity Log" webpage for Grassroots Network members to report their personal contacts with U.S. Representatives and Senators.  I urge you to use this page so we can get a better handle on how we are interacting with members of Congress.

        Seven NRLN/Retiree Association leaders give their personal comments on the importance of communicating with members of Congress on issues critical to retirees. Read the NRLN Board Member profile on Judy Stenberg to learn why she believe the NRLN is the best channel to have retirees' demands heard in Washington, DC.

        In her column, Marta Bascom, NRLN Executive Director, points out that, as retirees, it is vitally important to keep Congress' attention focused on issues which will have the greatest benefit for older Americans as incumbents and challengers campaign for your vote in the November general election.

        I urge you to read the 8-page newsletter and share it with your friends who are not familiar with the NRLN.  Email the link to them or print out copies and give it to them if they don't have Internet access.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The NRLN continues to use its whitepaper written last year to advocate with members of Congress and their staffs the need for legislation to reduce the cost of prescription drugs. The NRLN is seeking legislation to accomplish the following: (1) Enable re-importation and importation of safe, FDA approved prescription drugs; (2) Enable Medicare to develop formularies and take competitive bids for prescription drugs; (3) Staff and fund the FDA to reduce the generic drug approval backlog; (4) Prevent drug companies from colluding to subvert free market practices. We must continue to remind Congress that until they demand truly competitive markets year-over-year cost and profit increase will not be stopped.

The NRLN recognizes that many of our Grassroots Network members are concerned that introducing more competition into the U.S. pharmaceutical industry could compromise the quality of prescription drugs for American consumers. The fact is that most pharmaceutical ingredients used by American companies are currently manufactured overseas.

A January 20, 2009 New York Times article revealed that "the critical ingredients for most antibiotics are now made almost exclusively in China and India." The same is true for other crucial medicines used for such things as diabetes and high blood pressure."

"Drug labels often claim that the pills are manufactured in the United States, but the listed manufacturing plants are often the sites where foreign-made drug powders are pounded into pills and packaged," according to the New York Times.

American drug manufacturers are a part of the offshore problem. Ingredients and pills processed offshore are sold into foreign countries at much lower prices than in the U.S. This places the American consumer in the position of having to pay excessive prices that effectively subsidize foreign cost of sales and expenses.

A recent study showed that American pharmaceutical companies raised prices on their brand-name drugs by 9.3% and on specialty drugs by 10.3% during the same period that the overall consumer price index fell by 0.3%.  The NRLN believes these levels of price increases on prescription drugs are unacceptable, especially when retirees must buy their medicines with limited, fixed incomes.  The NRLN will continue its efforts to gain legislation to introduce more competition to break the stranglehold that drug companies have on Americans. 

Bill Kadereit

President, National Retiree Legislative Network

 

 


VERY URGENT
- NRLN Action Alert
Tell Lawmakers To Help Secure Your Pension
 

MY PREVIOUS MESSAGE TO YOU ASKED THAT YOU SEND A CAPWIZ MESSSAGE TO YOUR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBER WHO CAN HELP SECURE YOUR PENSION. SO FAR, MANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN CONTENT TO "LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT".  PLEASE HELP BY TAKING ACTION ON BEHALF OF YOURSELF AND ALL OTHER RETIREES.  IF YOU DON'T, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT YOU MAY REGRET IT SOMEDAY.

THE CURRENT STOCK MARKET MELT DOWN COMBINED WITH THE UNETHICAL TAKING OF ASSETS FROM YOUR PENSION PLAN MAY BE PLACING YOUR FUTURE AT RISK AND YOU WILL NOT KNOW IT FOR MONTHS. LET'S STOP COMPANIES LIKE GM, CHRYSLER, ALCATEL-LUCENT, QWEST, AT&T, DETROIT EDISON AND OTHERS FROM STEALING OUR PENSION SECURITY BY DEMANDING THAT H.R. 4213 INCLUDES LANGUAGE THAT WILL PROTECT OUR PENSIONS.

Click http://capwiz.com/abtr/home/ to access the NRLN Action Alert labeled ACT NOW TO PROTECT PENSIONS.  Click the "Take Action" button, type in your zip code and click "GO" to identify your Representative.  Click the "Elected Officials" tab and write down his or her phone number! Now personalize the letter with your own comments if you want to. If you have a problem accessing the Action Alert with the above link, go to www.nrln.org and click on the "Take Action Now" at the top of the NRLN website's home page.

SEND YOUR MESSAGE (SEE IT BELOW) NOW...... ALSO CALL HIM OR HER OR TELL ANYBODY THAT ANSWERS, THAT YOU SENT A MESSAGE AND THAT YOU EXPECT ACTION NOT POLITICAL BS...SAY IT LIKE YOU MEAN IT......MAKE THAT CALL!!!

You can also find your Representative's phone number in the Congressional Directory on the NRLN website at: http://capwiz.com/abtr/dbq/officials/ .

Nike says it best --- JUST DO IT!

---------------------------------------------------------

Sample Letter:

Dear Representative ____________:

I am writing to ask that you to keep in H.R. 4213 the provision limiting the ability of companies opting for funding relief to use pension plan assets to make lump sum severance payments.  I have heard that General Motors is opposing this limitation.  GM, Chrysler, Alcatel-Lucent, Delta and other companies have proven untrustworthy to protect the interests of employees and retirees by using pension assets for non-pension expenses. I believe you have a public policy obligation to me to stop this!

GM reported a $1.8 billion shortfall as of October 31, 2008, a deficit that had swollen far larger by February 2009.  The Detroit Free Press reported that, GM and Chrysler admitted that, for the first time in their history, they were using pension assets to fund lump sum severance payments, ranging from $45,000 to $62,500, that would be paid in addition to workers' accrued retirement benefit. Alcatel-Lucent published in its 2003 10-K that they took $2 billion. Delphi used this "back door reversions" practice and it contributed to the tragedy of many Delphi salaried retirees and placed the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation at risk. The PBGC took over the Delphi salaried pension plan, at 55% funded. These lump sum payments are bribes to induce early retirement and are business expenses, not pension benefits. If you don't understand the concepts, ask an accountant, FASB or the CBO.

Last month the Government Accountability Office reported that GM will need to add $12.3 billion to its pension fund by 2014 and Chrysler will need to add $2.62 billion. If those contributions aren't met, is the federal government going to step in and pay for the pensions of the 956,000 GM and Chrysler employees and retirees?

Does Congress want to offer funding relief to GM, Chrysler and others yet leave the door open for them during the funding relief period to simultaneously remove assets from the pension plan for corporate restructuring expenses?

You need to take action that is in the best interest of the constituents in your District who voted to send you to Congress to take care of their business. I want to hear from you that you will do everything possible to include a provision in the House bill to protect pension plan assets for the benefit of retirees. I want action, not rhetoric and I need it now. Please do the right thing!

Sincerely,

 

 

  
            NRLN Presents Legislative Agenda to White House Staff

As the result of a number of NRLN letters sent to the White House, President Obama's staff charged with crafting and managing health care reform policy for the Administration invited the NRLN Washington, DC team to a one-on-one meeting. Marta Bascom, NRLN Executive Director, and Michael Calabrese, NRLN Legislative Strategist, met on Thursday, Feb. 17th, with key staff members to reiterate the NRLN's primary health care legislative priorities. The NRLN staff placed emphasis on the reimportation of safe, lower cost prescription drugs; the NRLN's Maintenance of Cost Payment proposal to protect retirement benefits as currently embodied in the House health care reform bill, and Medicare buy-in for retirees ages 55-64 at a cost that will not burden Medicare, plus other issues important to retirees.

The White House staff restated President Obama's commitment to comprehensive health care reform and reviving the conference on the bills that have been passed by the House and Senate. The NRLN urged the White House to support the NRLN's efforts on Capitol Hill to get these proposals passed independently should they not pass in a comprehensive national health care bill. Many of the issues of great importance to retirees are not included in the final, pared-down bills on the Hill and need to be addressed immediately.

The fact that the White House invited the NRLN's staff to a meeting demonstrates that our messages are gaining the attention of government leaders. The emails and phone calls to Washington, DC from our Grassroots Network members are an important part of making the voices of retirees heard. Together, our efforts will make a positive contribution to retirement security.

Finally, I want to share with you below the text of a letter that I sent to Senator Harry Reid, Majority Leader, with a copy to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on the subject of pension asset protection. A similar personalized letter was sent to six other leaders in the Senate. We are closely tracking the pension funding relief issue in Congress and may need to call on our Grassroots Network members to send letters and make phone calls to their elected representatives.

Bill Kadereit
President, National Retiree Legislative Network

--------------------------------------------------------------

February 14, 2010

The Honorable Harry Reid, Majority Leader
United States Senate
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-2803

Dear Senator Reid:

It is understandable that a number of Senators would be sympathetic to the appeals from numerous companies for temporary relief from pension plan funding requirements due to the steep market slide in 2008. The National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN), which represents the interests of more than 2 million retirees who have retired from 114 companies and public entities, recognizes the plight of these companies. We would not want to force contributions to pension plans that would cause irreparable harm to the companies, trigger layoffs or result in companies declaring bankruptcy.

However, pension plan assets currently held in trust should not be allowed to be used by these same companies to pay for operating expenses. ERISA should be amended to stop companies from using pension assets to make severance payments during a corporate restructuring. These "back door reversions" represent a widespread practice by companies to circumvent the Congressional policy against reverting pension assets for corporate purposes. It simply doesn't make sense for Congress to authorize a funding hiatus without simultaneously closing this back door.

To better protect the pensions of retirees and future retirees, I urge you to include in the Senate's pension funding relief bill language similar to the provisions that are in Section 111 (pages 65 and 66) of H.R. 3936, the Preserve Benefits and Jobs Act of 2009, sponsored by Representatives Earl Pomeroy and Pat Tiberi.

The language in Section 111 relating to a company's ability to amend its pension plan, in part, states: "No ad hoc amendment to a defined benefit plan which is a single employer plan which has the effect of increasing liabilities of the plan by reason of increases in benefits, establishment of new benefits, changing the rate of benefit accrual, or changing the rate of which benefits become nonforfeitable may take effect during the plan year if the adjusted funding target attainment percentage for such plan year is- ''(I) less than 120 percent, or ''(II) would be less than 120 percent taking into account such amendment."

An increasing number of companies have tapped pension assets to pay for lump sum payments equal to six (6) months or even twelve (12) months pay to employees who agree to retire within a specific time window. In 2001 and 2002, a struggling Lucent Technologies charged $2.2 billion in lump sum "termination benefits" to its various employee pension plans. More recently, GM used $2.9 billion in pension assets to make lump sum severance payments during 2008 - and ended the year with a $12.4 billion pension deficit ($20 billion by PBGC calculations). AT&T, Bethlehem Steel, Chrysler, Consolidated Freightways, Delphi, Delta Air Lines, Federal Express, Polaroid, Qwest, United Airlines, Verizon and many other corporate plan sponsors have raided pension assets with impunity and used those assets to cover their business restructuring expenses.

These back door reversions are not offset by corresponding reductions to pension liabilities and are gone forever. This practice places pension plans at risk to be terminated. It is past time to end this pilfering of defined plan pension assets. These actions threaten the security of pension plans and the potential is great that the Pension Benefits Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) might have to take over the plan in the future. Furthermore, depleted assets reduce the likelihood the plan will ever generate surplus assets that can be used to offset corporate health care costs for retirees or be available for pension Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs), a benefit that non-government retirees seldom receive.

The NRLN has researched and written a whitepaper on how companies are misusing pension plan assets and provides our proposed amendments to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 to prevent the abuses. I have attached the Executive Summary from the whitepaper. If you would like to receive a copy of the entire whitepaper, please contact Marta Bascom, the NRLN's Executive Director, on (703) 863-9611 or by email at marta.bascom@linkspace.net .

The Senate has an opportunity for a quid pro quo-companies receive temporary funding relief and retirees gain the protection of their pension assets from being used for non-pension expenses. Please don't miss this opportunity to provide for the financial security of America's retirees. NRLN members who are Nevada residents have retired from AT&T, Alcatel-Lucent, Chrysler, Delta Air Lines, General Motors, Qwest and NRLN individual members retired from many other companies will appreciate your support on this matter.

Sincerely,
Signed
Bill Kadereit
President, National Retiree Legislative Network

Attachment

Copy to: Representative Nancy Pelosi, Speaker
U.S. House of Representatives
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          NRLN
                                                 National Retiree
                                              Legislative Network


Back Door Reversions:
Draining Pension Assets for Severance and Other
Corporate Purposes Threatens Retirement Security
Executive Summary

The use of pension assets to make severance payments during a corporate restructuring is the largest and most widespread "back door reversion" by which some companies are seeking to circumvent the Congressional policy against reverting pension assets for corporate purposes. When pension funds were used to finance hostile takeovers and the mass layoffs that typically followed, in 1990 Congress stopped the practice by imposing a 50 percent excise tax on pension reversions. But today's "back door reversions" are more insidious. Although ERISA explicitly prohibits the use of qualified pension assets for "layoff benefits," companies can amend a plan at any time not merely to offer older workers enhanced early retirement benefits (by awarding extra years of service credit), but even to offer lump sum severance payments equal to a year's salary or more as part of a corporate restructuring.

The 2006 Pension Protection Act tightened up on this practice somewhat by requiring plan sponsors to pre-fund a plan amendment that increases benefit liabilities to the extent the plan's funding level would fall below 80 percent (after taking account of the new benefit liability). However, as the 2008 stock market meltdown demonstrated, a plan that is only 80 percent funded during a bull market could easily end up below 60 percent funded in a bear market - and in default with the PBGC if the plan sponsor declares bankruptcy. Moreover, any significant reduction below full funding not only leaves all plan participants insecure, it also reduces the ability of the plan to build a surplus that could be used to grant cost-of-living adjustments to longtime retirees, whose fixed monthly benefits erode with inflation, or to offset the cost of retiree health benefits through a Section 420 transfer.

The trend toward distressed companies using employee pension assets to pay severance costs - instead of relying on a restructuring reserve or other corporate assets - is not new to the current financial crisis. Lucent, United Airlines, AT&T, Verizon, Qwest, Federal Express, Delta and Delphi are among the other companies that have tapped pension assets to pay corporate restructuring costs. Some of these companies drained pension assets for severance payments as they spiraled downhill toward bankruptcy and an eventual taxpayer bailout courtesy of the PBGC. Other companies, left under-funded, cut other retiree benefits across the board. And some others, although their plans remained solvent, used up "surplus" assets that could have benefitted the vast majority of plan participants if used instead for cost-of-living adjustments or offset the cost of retiree health care benefits. In the current crisis, General Motors used pension assets to pay for billions in severance payments during 2008 - and ended up with such a dangerous degree of under-funding that in early 2009 the Treasury Department restricted the practice as a condition of the federal bailout loan package.

The most effective way for Congress to protect plan participants (and taxpayers) from unfunded liabilities from severance, layoff or any other benefit increase is simply to increase the target funding level threshold required for unfunded benefit increases and lump sum payouts from the 80 percent level, currently required under the PPA, to 120 percent. Severance or other benefit increases to selected individuals that are not funded should be paid out of the company's operating expenses, not from the pension trust. This would not limit the ability of plan sponsors to enhance benefits. What it does do is require companies to currently fund lump sum payouts or other benefit increases that would otherwise cause the plan to become under-funded or worsen its level of under-funding. Amendments increasing benefits that are collectively bargained or negotiated between a plan sponsor and bona fide union representatives, or in the context of a jointly-trusteed Taft-Hartley plan, should be exempted from this more restrictive funding level.

================================================
       NRLN Challenge in 2010 - Protect Social Security and Medicare

After the dust settles on the national health care debate, we will be challenged to lobby harder than ever to protect Social Security and Medicare benefits. Congress never intended to address Medicare benefits in a meaningful way in health care reform legislation. But the President and some members of Congress have announced that 2010 will be the year when they form task forces and committees to address Medicare and Social Security.

We are making progress on pension asset protection legislation and hope to wage a strong campaign to protect existing health care benefits and not just maintain Medicare benefits but to get catastrophic coverage (out-if-pocket limits) added to Medicare. A summary version of the Top Priorities and the rest of our 2010 Legislative Agenda are shown below.

The NRLN board and retiree association leaders from across the country met in Washington D.C, last week, to set the NRLN 2010 Legislative Agenda for lobbying to protect your income and health care related benefits. They approved our budget and lobbying plans and met with guest speakers from Capitol Hill and federal agencies to discuss what can and must be done to maintain and advance retiree benefits. Topics ranged from pension security to bankruptcy and Medicare. Executives from the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC), the Department of Labor, and Congressional committees spoke and responded to questions.

Perhaps the best part of our NRLN Annual Leadership Conference was when conferees walked to appointments on the Hill to tell their members of Congress about our Legislative Agenda and what they want Congress to do about it. NRLN members made appointments and met with forty-six different members if Congress and their staffs on January 13.

Leaders from the GM, Chrysler, Kodak, and Lucent Technologies retiree associations met with House and Senate Judiciary staffs and legal counsel and hope to get a hearing scheduled to air the need for corporate bankruptcy law reform. The Delta Pilots, Chrysler and Alcatel Lucent members met with Congressional leaders on PBGC rules reform and grilled our PBGC speakers. Lucent, Qwest, Detroit Edison, and AT&T retiree attendees met on pension security and prescription drug legislation. We all expressed concern over the future of Medicare, Social Security and other issues specific to our retiree associations. Prospective NRLN members, association leaders from John Deere and Raytheon met with seven (7) different members of Congress. We will highlight details of the entire conference in our first 2010 issue of the FOCUS Newsletter. Soon we will invite you and others to another Fly-In lobby day that will take place probably in September.

Be sure to express appreciation to your retiree association presidents and others from your associations who attended last week and do your part by contributing time and money to the NRLN-affiliated retiree associations and the NRLN if you can. They are very serious on your behalf and unlike other larger U.S. organizations that claim to be friends of the retiree, they actually work hard to support just you. They don't have to be doing this, please support them.

Most of all, sign up your friends and neighbors, send us email distribution lists and work hard to help us grow a strong grassroots network in your hometown. Tip O'Neil, a deceased Speaker of the House once said "all politics is local". That is so true, meet with your hometown members of Congress and ask them what they are doing to support your retiree agenda.

Bill Kadereit
President, National Retiree Legislative Network

NRLN
National Retiree
Legislative Network
 

NRLN
National Retiree
Legislative Network

Summary of NRLN 2010 Legislative Agenda
(Full NRLN 2010 Legislative Agenda is available at
www.nrln.org)

                                              2010 TOP INITIATIVES

PENSION ASSET PROTECTION (PAP): The NRLN advocates legislation that stops corporations from taking pension assets from defined pension plan trusts to pay for lump sum severance and early retirement incentives. The NRLN advocates that pension funds not be used to pay executive non-qualified pensions and other deferred compensation. The NRLN advocates that pension plan assets should not be transferred to or be taken over by third party financial or other institutions.

PBGC REFORM: The NRLN advocates that the Pension Benefits Guaranty Corporation must be regulated to ensure equitable calculations of benefit payments earned by retirees.

BANKRUPTCY REFORM: The NRLN advocates that bankruptcy reform is needed to place retirees' pensions and benefits on a list of obligations that companies can't shed. Retirees often lose pension, health care, and other benefits and, unlike secured creditors, rarely have the ability to recover losses.

PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF RETIREE HEALTH CARE BENEFITS:
MAINTENANCE OF COST PAYMENT: The NRLN advocates a Maintenance of Cost Payment (MCP) proposal that would establish a fixed monthly payment to retirees equivalent to the value an employer provided prior to the reduction or cancellation of retirement health care, prescription drugs, life insurance, long-term care or other benefits. Companies would be entitled to tax credits as an offset to MCP payments.

MEDICARE BUY-IN FOR AGES 55-64: The NRLN advocates that adults age 55 to 64 be allowed to buy Medicare coverage at a cost that does not burden the Medicare system. Access could be limited to individuals without access to an employer-sponsored or other group health plan that is actuarially equivalent or superior to Medicare.

INCLUSION OF CATASTROPHIC COVERAGE IN MEDICARE: The NRLN advocates that Congress should extend protection against catastrophic medical costs to the Medicare population by setting a reasonable maximum limit on out-of-pocket costs.

PROTECT RETIREES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS: The NRLN advocates law that clarifies what a parent foreign owner's pension plan obligations are to abide by ERISA should its U.S. subsidiary be spun off or dissolved. Clarification must include situations where foreign corporations that own U.S. subsidiaries are also acquired by a third party, foreign-owned corporation.

REDUCE THE COST OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS: The NRLN advocates the reduction of prescription drug costs for Americans through passage of legislation that: (1) Enables re-importation and importation of safe prescription drugs approved by the FDA; (2) Enables Medicare to develop formularies and take competitive bids for prescription drugs; (3) Staffs and funds the FDA to reduce the generic drug approval backlog; (4) Prevents drug companies from colluding to control pricing or subvert free market practices.

PROTECT MEDICARE: The NRLN advocates that Congress must guard against reductions in Medicare expenditures that negatively impact the care that retirees receive from doctors, hospitals and other health care services.

PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY: The NRLN advocates legislation to make Social Security financially sound without reducing current and future retiree benefits.

THE REMAINDER OF THE 2010 NRLN LEGISLATIVE AGENDA

Cash Balance Plans: The NRLN advocates the elimination of "wear-away" rules contained in cash-balance plans.

EEOC Rule: The NRLN advocates elimination of the EEOC final ruling issued on December 26, 2007, allowing employers to cancel earned health care benefits of Medicare eligible retirees.

Company Benefits Bundling: The NRLN advocates legislation to prohibit companies from forcing retirees to choose between company pre-determined bundles of plans or none of their sponsored Health Care and Prescription Drug Plans. Bundling practices hold retirees hostage to such plans.

Encourage Retention Of Company-Provided Health Care For Retirees: The NRLN advocates legislation that would increase the Medicare Part D prescription plan subsidy paid to employers who offer better coverage than required for equivalent coverage in Part D, if they agree to maintain their current plans.

Taxing Health Care Benefits: The NRLN advocates that the portion of premiums paid by employers that is currently treated as a tax-free benefit to employees and retirees should remain tax free.

Deductibility Of Health Care Costs: The NRLN advocates new legislation that enables health care and Medicare premiums to be tax deductible, similar to the way health insurance premiums for the self-employed are deductible. Such deductions would be exempt from the 7.5% (AGI) limitation.

Health Savings Accounts (HSA's): The NRLN advocates changing the IRS Code of 1986 to allow HSA funding directly from IRAs for all years, not one year, without tax penalties and limits on annual contributions.

Withdrawals To Pay Retiree Health Premiums: The NRLN advocates laws that enable penalty- free withdrawals from 401k, IRA, SEP and other qualified accounts to pay retiree health care premiums.

Alternate Minimum Tax: The NRLN advocates legislation that raises the Alternative Minimum Tax threshold level and also the annual inflation indexing of the threshold.

Taxing Social Security Income: The NRLN advocates legislation to amend the tax codes to eliminate federal and state taxes on all Social Security income and/or allow a tax credit for taxes withheld.

401-k / IRA Mandatory Distribution Requirement From 70 ½ to age 75: The NRLN advocates legislation that will allow individual choice to defer Required Mandatory Distribution (RMD) from retirement savings accounts.


 

 
The LRO Newsletter:  If for some reason the link below to the LRO Newsletter shouldn't work or go bad you can click on the link here to be able to open the file.  (Click Here)  If you don't have the lastest Adobe Reader you will also need it to view the file and you can get it here.  Just click on the link  http://get.adobe.com/reader/
 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lucent Retirees Organization Newsletter
SPECIAL NOTICE
November 2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                           2009 LRO FALL NEWSLETTER AVAILAILABLE ON WEBSITE.

This is a special newsletter! It arrives and is available at the same time as your Alcatel-Lucent (ALU) Open Enrollment
Package. In this newsletter we discuss your Open Enrollment and Healthcare benefits in much more detail. Also included in the
newsletter are the results of LROs meeting with ALU Officers, Regional News and much more.

The 2009 Fall Newsletter is now available for you to read on the LRO website
at:http:// www.lucentretirees.com/docs/Newsletter2009-FALL.pdf   

The LRO hopes you will find the new format of the newsletter attractive and easy to read.

You will need Adobe Reader software to be able to open the newsletter. If you do not have Adobe Reader software, please
go to the following link and download the latest version of the FREE Adobe Reader:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
If the link above to the LRO website does not provide you access to the newsletter, you may go to the LRO Home
Page/Latest News at: http://www.lucentretirees.com  and click on the link in the item about the newsletter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Join Our Mailing List
[http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1102226108370]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Privacy Policy:
http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

Email Marketing by
Constant Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com

Lucent Retirees Organization | PO Box 412 | Chatham | NJ | 07928

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lucent Retirees Organization Newsletter
Alcatel-Lucent Confirms Annual Open Enrollment Period
October 17, 2009

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Alcatel-Lucent Confirms Annual Open Enrollment Period for the 2010 Health and Welfare Benefits Coverage
October 15, 2009

In a recent mailing to management retirees, Alcatel-Lucent (ALU) confirmed that the annual open enrollment period for the 2010 Alcatel-Lucent health and welfare benefits starts November 9, 2009 at 8:00am Eastern Standard Time (EST) and ends on November 20, 2009 at 6:00pm EST. Late enrollments will not be allowed so you must take action before 6:00pm EST on the last day of open enrollment.

For open enrollment you will need your password to access your personalized benefits information and/or enroll. If you want to check out your password to see that it is active, go to your Benefits Resources website at: http://resources.hewitt.com/alcatel-lucent and Select "Log On" - then enter your social security number and password.
If you misplaced or can't remember your password, you should request a new one now. It can take up to ten days to receive a new password in the mail. You can request a new password by going to your Benefits Resources website at: http://resources.hewitt.com/alcatel-lucent. Select "Log On"; then enter your social security number, then select "I Forgot My Password." If you have a preferred email address on file you can request to have the new password sent to you electronically, or, you can request to have it mailed to you. Note that it can take up to ten days to receive the new password in the mail.

For those that don't have internet access, you can call the Alcatel-Lucent Benefits Center at 1-888-232-4111 to request a new password. Follow the prompts to enter your social security number. Then press "99" followed by the # key. At the next menu, press "2", and then press "1"; you can then hang up - your request is complete and your new password will be sent to you.

Alcatel-Lucent will mail a bright yellow envelope containing your enrollment materials to you. It should arrive in early November. This package will contain both personalized and non-personalized information about your 2010 benefits and how to enroll. Alcatel-Lucent reports that Benefit Representatives will not have information about your 2010 benefits prior to the open enrollment date of November 9; therefore, they have requested that you do not call the Alcatel-Lucent Benefits Center with questions about your 2010 benefit options or pricing prior to November 9. If you want to review non-personalized enrollment information prior to receiving it in the mail you can log on to the BenefitAnswers Plus website at www.benefitanswersplus.com, starting the week of October 19, 2009.

Alcatel-Lucent has announced that the SecureHorizons "MedicareDirect" PFFS Retiree Plan will again be offered as a medical plan option for 2010. In late October, SecureHorizons will mail coverage information to those of you that are currently enrolled in this plan or will become Medicare eligible by December 31st. For those who have opted out of this plan but now may be interested in enrolling for 2010, watch for details in the mail on how to request a plan information package.

ALU will also be offering the Medco Rx Plan for 2010 to those who are on their health care plan. As in 2009, you will have to be on both their health care and prescription drug plans, or you will not be eligible to either plan.

Should you need additional assistance during the open enrollment process, the Lucent Retirees Organization (LRO) encourages you to visit the LRO Benefits website at www.lucentretirees.com and click on the Benefits tab. Additional information and resources will be available to help you through the 2010 benefits open enrollment process. This site will be updated on a continuous basis as more timely information becomes available.
LRO Benefits Team

Email Marketing by
Lucent Retirees Organization | PO Box 412 | Chatham | NJ | 0

 
 

 

NRLN Advocates Revisions to House Healthcare Bill Amendments

 You may recall that in my July 15th message to NRLN Grassroots Network members, I reported that in the U.S. House TriCommittees' healthcare reform bill released on July 14th there were elements of the NRLN's Maintenance of Cost Payment (MCP) proposal to protect retiree benefits. During the days prior to the House's August Recess, the TriCommittees' bill went through what is known as the "markup" process and two "Manager's Amendments" were added to the bill.

These amendments are in Sections 164 and 165 of H.R. 3200, America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.  While these Sections reflect our MCP proposal and what we had asked Congress to do, we have been studying these Sections and our Washington, DC staff has been discussing the language with influential members of House committees and staff members of those committees. The NRLN has concluded that certain aspects of both Sections need to be changed to provide the most protection to retirees' healthcare benefits. 

First, I'll address Section 165 which if enacted would amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to expressly bar employer-sponsored healthcare plans from reducing medical, surgical, hospital and prescription drug benefits for retirees and beneficiaries after an individual retires.  This is similar to the objective of our MCP and would be very beneficial to retirees and their beneficiaries. In essence, it would provide ERISA protection to retirement healthcare benefits similar to the protection granted under ERISA to pension plans. 

After stating that retirees' benefits are barred from being reduced, language was unfortunately added stating, "unless such reduction is also made with respect to active participants." The NRLN opposes this exception.  It would provide an incentive to employers to reduce retirees' healthcare benefits by also reducing the benefits of active employees or by reducing existing retiree benefits to a lower level that matched benefits of active employees. We know of a number of cases where the active employees' health care benefits have already been eliminated but retirees still have some benefits.

 In addition to advocating that this exception be removed, the NRLN is asking the TriCommittees' leaders to make the Section 165 ERISA protection effective 12-31-2008.  Many NRLN members experienced significant changes in their healthcare benefits on 1-1-2009. 

As you may recall, our MCP included a proposal to provide incentives for employers to maintain healthcare benefits for all retirees.  While there is not a tax credit incentive currently in Sections 164 and 165 as the MCP proposed, Section 164 would establish a "reinsurance program" to provide reimbursement to employers for much of the cost of providing health benefits to retirees age 55 or older, but not Medicare eligible, and to eligible spouses, surviving spouses and dependents of retirees. A federal trust fund would reimburse employers for 80% of the claim cost that exceeds $15,000 but is less than $90,000. The NRLN supports this incentive but requests Section 164 be changed to include all retirees, including Medicare-eligible retirees. 

Our Washington, DC staff believes that the NRLN needs to generate a considerable amount of retiree support for Sections 164 and 165, along with the changes we deem necessary, to keep these amendments in H.R. 3200 when the House takes up the bill again after Labor Day.  Following this message is the latest draft of the NRLN's "Talking Points" that includes what we want to happen with healthcare reform plus pension asset protection, bankruptcy reform and PBGC rule changes. 

 Please print out these "Talking Points" to use and leave with your Senators and Representative when you meet with them during the August Recess whether during personal appointments or town hall meetings. The NRLN Grassroots Network members who will be going to Washington, DC on September 15-17 for meetings on Capitol Hill are encouraged to begin their "homework" with these "Talking Points."  If situations change during the coming weeks, we will update the "Talking Points" as necessary. 

Soon, I will be sending letters to the leaders of the TriCommittees to urge them to keep Sections 164 and 165 in the bill, but make the changes that the NRLN believes are crucial to protecting retirees' healthcare benefits.  In addition, I will be asking the Grassroots Network members who are constituents of the TriCommittees' leaders to respond to an NRLN Action Alert and send the emails advocating the NRLN's position on the amendments.

 After two years of lobbying for the MCP (read the NRLN Legislative Agenda at www.nrln.org), the concepts are in the House bill, but fine tuning is necessary. Now that we are this close we must work together to keep the concepts in the House bill. The Senate bill that is still being drafted does not currently contain these provisions for retirees.

 Bill Kadereit, President

National Retiree Legislative Network  

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

National Retiree Legislative Network

Legislative Agenda Priorities

 PENSION ASSET PROTECTION, BANKRUPTCY and PBGC RULES REFORM

Protection of Defined Pension Plan Assets: - The NRLN's proposed refinements to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 are vital to the continued protection of plan assets and PBGC viability, and to the generation of surplus assets that can be used to offset corporate healthcare costs or be available for Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA's). Pension plan assets must:

  • Not be used to pay for corporate restructuring lump sum severance allowances or buyouts.
  • Not be used to pay for executive management non-qualified pensions or other deferred compensation.
  • Not be at risk to be sold by plan sponsors or the PBGC to third party financial or other institutions.

Pension Funding Rules - Increase the maximum asset funding contribution level from 100% to 120% so companies can over-fund plans when cash flow permits. 

Bankruptcy Reform -

  • Require that companies must provide retirees with an updated list of all retirees and that it must be updated throughout Chapter 11 proceedings.
  • Mandate Section 1114 Committees within 60 days of Chapter 11 filing date.
  • Permanently increase the Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC) payment from 65% to 80% (post stimulus).
  • Disallow company Reservation Of Rights (ROR) clauses as reason for denying retiree's rights to a Section 1114 Committee.
  • Require pension plan sponsors to fund underfunded plans after passage of 365 days from date of filing for Chapter 11 protection.

 PBGC Rules Reform -

  • Proposed Bill - The Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation shall use the Defined Benefit Plan income and pension benefit limitations defined in IRS codes 401(a) and 415(b) in effect on the date of the plan termination when calculating the pension benefits payable under Priority Category Three (PC3). In addition, the retiree's actual age and length of service at retirement will be used when calculating benefits protected under Priority Category PC3. These changes shall be retroactive and apply to all defined benefit plans terminated after Sept 11, 2001.
  • PBGC termination valuation - PBGC rules used to determine the termination values of plans and all other PBGC rules and guidelines should be fully disclosed and made a part of the Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006.

Go to www.nrln.org and click on the link to read the NRLN's complete Legislative Agenda.

National Retiree Legislative Network

Legislative Agenda Priorities

 HEALTHCARE INCLUDING PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

  • The House TriCommittee bill H.R. 3200 incorporates MCP concepts:    H.R. 3200, Section 165 - Prohibition Against Post-Retirement Reductions of Retiree Health Benefits - bars the reduction of retiree benefits post-retirement and prohibits reservation of rights clauses as a plan sponsor defense, "unless such reduction is also made with respect to active participants". The NRLN opposes the quoted exception and also requests a revision such that Section 165 protection becomes effective 12-31-2008.
  • H.R. 3200, Section 164 - Reinsurance Program for Retirees - creates a temporary reinsurance program for retirees age 55 or older but not Medicare eligible. Companies would be reimbursed for the cost of benefits paid to retirees or eligible dependents and for plan deductibles, co-payments and co-insurance. Plans would be reimbursed for 80% of the claim cost that exceeds $15,000 but is less than $90,000. The NRLN supports this incentive only if Section 164 is amended to include Medicare-eligible retirees.
  • Pass legislation that enables importation of prescription drugs, competitive bidding of Medicare-D prescription drugs; funding the FDA to reduce generic drug backlogs; stopping brand drug makers from paying generic drug manufacturers to withhold generic drugs off the market.
  • Use savings from the four initiatives above to pay for the elimination of the "doughnut hole" in the Medicare Part D prescription drug plan and to pay for a Medicare catastrophic benefit and a large amount if national healthcare. 
  • When an employer eliminates its healthcare plan, retirees usually lose "catastrophic coverage" which limits out- of-pocket medical expenses to a fixed amount, such as $1,500. Given this loss, the NRLN believes that catastrophic coverage should be added to Medicare.
  • It is difficult for many men and women age 50 to 64 who have been laid off or retired early-either forced or voluntary-to purchase affordable healthcare insurance because of their age. They should be allowed to buy into Medicare at a cost that does not burden the system.

Healthcare Taxation:

  • Don't tax employer benefits or premiums and leave the AGI threshold 7.5%.

Go to www.nrln.org and click on the link to read the NRLN's complete Legislative Agenda. To read the NRLN testimony by Bill Kadereit on healthcare for retirees before the House Education & Labor Committee in September 2008, go to http://www.nrln.org/NRLN%202008%20Action%20%20Accomplishments%20Handouts.pdf

 

 

 If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from us, please click here.

http://capwiz.com/abtr/utr/i1/EZWELCAGLU/3785254081/img/capwizlogo.gif


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                   NRLN Bulletin
                             U.S. House TriCommittee's Bill Includes Proposals NRLN Advocated

After three years of the NRLN and its Grassroots Network members lobbying Congress on our Maintenance of Cost Payment (MCP) proposal to protect retiree benefits, we have learned that a U.S. House TriCommittee's health care reform bill released on Tuesday, July 14, contains elements of what we have been proposing.  In dealing with Congress it is rare that one gets in a bill all of what is being sought and this bill is no exception.  However, we consider it an important accomplishment that the three House Committees that the NRLN has been lobbying have included three provisions that have been central to the health care initiatives in the NRLN's Legislative Agenda.  These include:

  • A Maintenance of Cost Payment (MCP)-type proposal that gives employers a financial incentive to retain and pay for health care coverage for retirees by purchasing coverage through new state-administered insurance exchanges that greatly limit the ability of insurers to charge higher premiums based on age;

  • A $10 billion reinsurance program for retirees under which former employers that continue to provide and pay for insurance coverage for pre-Medicare-eligible retirees age 55 to 65 can be reimbursed for 80 percent of the cost of claims between $15,000 to $90,000.

  • Immediately reduce the Medicare Part D prescription drug "doughnut hole" by $500, beginning in 2011, and eliminate it entirely in phases over 15 years.

In addition, the House bill should generally lower health insurance costs for older workers and retirees by instituting insurance regulations that guarantee coverage, prohibit exclusions for pre-existing conditions, and put a fairly strict limit on the ability of insurers to charge higher premiums based on age.

The NRLN has lobbied in both the House and Senate for an MCP-type solution. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension (HELP) Committee's health care bill has a high-claim reimbursement provision nearly identical to the one in the House bill. Both provisions would be funded initially at $10 billion, but would be temporary and phase out as employers purchase coverage for retirees through the exchanges.  NRLN will advocate that this retiree reinsurance subsidy for employers be made permanent.  The NRLN also continues to advocate for higher subsidy levels for pre-65 individuals who have retired early-either voluntarily or forced-and the more rapid elimination of the "doughnut hole." 

Last September, I testified before the House Education and Labor Committee and recommended the MCP.  In addition, I requested that retirees ages 50 - 65 be allowed to buy into Medicare on a cost basis.  While the House and Senate Committees did not propose allowing pre-65 retirees to buy into Medicare directly, we are pleased that the Committee members recognized the need to provide an incentive to employers to continue coverage since it is difficult and often cost-prohibitive for men and women in this age group to purchase health care insurance.  The House Tri-Committee bill also includes a public plan option that is functionally the same as a Medicare buy-in at cost, since it would reimburse using Medicare rates and will use all doctors and hospitals currently accepting Medicare patients, unless they affirmatively opt out. Since 2006, the first year of operation for Medicare Part D, the NRLN knew that the out-of-pocket cost for prescription drugs once the "doughnut hole" was reached would be a financial burden for many retirees and we have lobbied to eliminate it.

A great deal of credit goes to the NRLN Grassroots Network members who have sent thousands of emails and talked with Senators and Representatives to advocate support for the NRLN's health care agenda. Your NRLN Executive Director Marta Bascom and our Legislative Strategist Michael Calabrese have both worked very hard on the Hill with Congressional staffs, telling our story and advocating our proposals.

We will need to continue our lobbying efforts to have the provisions beneficial to retirees in whatever additional bills that eventually are drafted in the Senate and the bills that are ultimately voted on in both chambers.  Our Washington team will continue to be engaged daily with Congressional staff members who are working on health care proposals. 

We will let you know when the time is right and what message we'd like for you to once again communicate to your elected representatives in an email, a phone call to their office and in talking with them when they are back home during the Congressional Summer Recess in August.  Until that time, please send your members of Congress the NRLN's sample letter that can be accessed through the NRLN's Action Alert at:  http://capwiz.com/abtr/home/ . Look for the Action Alert headline: CONGRESS MUST HEAR THE HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF 50 MILLION AMERICAN RETIREES.  It is my opinion that there is no such thing as telling your elected representatives too often what you want included in health care reform legislation and what you want them to oppose.

Because leaders in the U.S. Senate are now saying they will not vote on a bill until after they return to Washington following the Summer Recess (Aug. 10 - Sept. 7), it appears likely that the NRLN Grassroots Network members who come to Washington on Sept. 15 - 17 will have an opportunity to lobby health care issues on Capitol Hill along with our pension protection and bankruptcy reform initiatives. It is not too late for you to decide to join us in Washington. Details about this event are available in a video clip and an invitation posted on the NRLN website home page at www.nrln.org .

Bill Kadereit, President

National Retiree Legislative Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         NRLN's Letter Sent To President Obama On Prescription Drugs

Below is the text of a letter that NRLN President Bill Kadereit has faxed to President Obama.  Letters on this prescription drugs issue were also faxed to Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief-of-Staff; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Senator Byron Dorgan and Senator Olympia Snowe, who introduced the "Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act", and Representative Henry Waxman, Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who is one of the architects of the health care reform legislation being drafted in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Ed Beltram, Vice President - Communications

National Retiree Legislative Network

----------------------------------------------
(Faxed on NRLN Letterhead)

July 13, 2009
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama:

As a U.S. Senator and a Presidential candidate you supported reimportation of prescription drugs.  Therefore, I was shocked to read in a July 7th article in The Wall Street Journal that W. J. "Billy" Tauzin, the chief lobbyist for America's pharmaceutical industry, stated he has heard "reassuring words" from White House officials that if the health care bill passes "the cost savings will be so great that reimportation of U.S. manufactured prescription drugs from other countries will be unnecessary." (By Alicia Mundy, "White House Assures Drug Makers on Reimportation," WSJ, July 7, 2009.)

For a number of years the National Retiree Legislative Network (NRLN), which represents the interests of more than 2 million retirees from 87 employers, has urged Congress to pass legislation to allow U.S.-licensed pharmacies and drug wholesalers to import FDA-approved medications from Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Japan and pass along the savings to their American customers. This would be accomplished by the enactment of the "Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act" introduced by Senators Byron Dorgan and Olympia Snowe in March 2009.

I'm sure you recall that when you were a Senator in 2006, you co-sponsored with Senator David Vitter a bill for the reimportation of prescription drugs.  Senator Vitter was able to get his reimportation prescription drug plan passed in the Senate by a 55-36 vote last week as part of to the bill funding the Homeland Security Department.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also voted for Senator Vitter's plan.  I think this shows there is broad bi-partisan support for unlocking the chains that the U.S. drug industry has had around American consumers.  I hope you will urge the Conference Committee to keep the reimportation provision in the bill.

If Mr. Tauzin has received reassuring words from the White House that reimportation will be unnecessary, Mr. President, you would be ill advised to break your campaign promise to support reimportation. Giving the drug companies a pass on competition gives the appearance that industry giant PhRMA, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America,  has bought itself out of health care reform legislation through its commitment to provide $80 billion in health care savings over the next 10 years.

The pharmaceutical industry has made the $80 billion in promised health care savings sound like a good deal for Americans. However, even if that $80 billion in voluntary savings could be enforced, it represents less than 3 percent of the projected dollars that Americans will spend on drugs during the next 10 years.  What we had understood to be your party's legislative agenda to reduce drug costs would save far more for both the federal budget and American consumers, especially retirees.

Passing legislation for the importation of prescription drugs from FDA-approved countries, competitive bidding by makers of prescription drugs for Medicare Part D, funding the FDA to reduce generic drug backlogs, and stopping drug companies from making contracts that require payoffs to generic manufacturers who withhold new generic drugs from the market would produce a savings for Americans well in excess of the 3 percent.

I strongly urge that you ask Congress to commission a CBO study to determine the combined cost savings potential of these initiatives. Also, please ask the Attorney General to stop the open restraint of trade practiced where brand dug makers pay generic drug makers to hold products from the market until patents expire.

According to an analysis by the Washington Post, PhRMA was the health care industry's biggest spender on lobbying in the first quarter of 2009 spending $7 million and employing 136 lobbyists, including 49 former government staff members.  Yielding to Big PhRMA is not the way to bring the change to Washington that you promised during your Presidential campaign.

News articles about Mr. Tauzin's statements that reimportation of prescription drugs will be unnecessary did not report who in the White House provided the alleged assurance.  I'm requesting that you provide the NRLN the name of the White House staff member who met with Mr. Tauzin.  Please ask that staff person to meet with Marta Bascom, the NRLN's Executive Director in Washington, DC, to discuss reimportation issues and other ways to reduce the cost of prescription drugs. Marta can be reached on 703-863-9611.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my requests.

Sincerely,

Signed by Bill Kadereit

President, National Retiree Legislative Network

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRLN Grassroots Call To Action - Health Care Reform Legislation

All indications in our nation's capital are that some form of health care reform legislation will be passed this year. The Congressional timetable appears to be that bills will be introduced this summer and debated and voted on this fall.

It is now time for the NRLN Grassroots Network members to demonstrate they can be an effective force for gaining the attention of and influencing members of Congress. The NRLN is asking you to immediately call the state or district office of your U.S. Senators and Representative to request an appointment to meet with them when they are "back home" during the Memorial Day "District Work Period" scheduled for May 25 - 29.

You may do a search for your Senators' and Representative's office phone numbers either by their name or by your zip code on the NRLN website at http://capwiz.com/abtr/dbq/officials/ . If you search by your zip code, photos of your elected representatives will appear. Under the photos of your Senators and Representative, click on the "info" option. This will present a webpage with a photo of your lawmaker and a number of "tabs." Click on the "Contact" tab and you will access a webpage showing the addresses and phone numbers for the Washington, DC and state offices. Write down the phone number for the state office that is the closest to you.

When you call that phone number, inform the staff member that you are interested in having a one-on-one meeting with your elected representative to discuss your position on what should be in health care reform legislation. As you confirm appointments, please advise me by email at Rfjm9870@aol.com so that I can record it and follow with any added support I can provide; like helping to get others to join you.

If an appointment for a personal meeting is not possible, ask if the Senator or Representative will be conducting a Town Hall meeting in your area. If so, attend it, ask questions and make comments based on the NRLN's Health Care Reform Talking Points provided at the end of this email. Also, try to talk directly with your lawmaker before or after the Town Hall meeting. If Town Hall meetings aren't scheduled, ask for a meeting with the senior staff member in that office.

I encourage you to print a copy of the Talking Points at the end of this message and take them to your meeting with your Senators and Representative or senior staff member and leave the copy with him or her.

By meeting with your members of Congress during the May 25 - 29 period, you will be working to shape the future for health care reform in America. It is critical that retirees have a voice in this process. We will also ask Grassroots Network members to again engage their elected representatives during the Independence Day recess on June 29 - July 5. In mid-September we are planning a "Retiree Health Care Week" in Washington, DC. We will ask constituents of key Senators and Representatives involved with health care legislation to come to Capitol Hill for meetings.

I would appreciate receiving an email from you after you have met with your Senators and Representative. Let me know their name, state/district and a brief summary of what transpired in your meeting. Send your email to Rfjm9870@aol.com.

Your participation in this "call to action" will be greatly appreciated.

Bob Martina, Vice President - Grassroots Network
National Retiree Legislative Network

------------------------------------------------------------------

National Retiree Legislative Network
Agenda on Health Care Reform Legislation

• Please keep retirees in mind during Congress' deliberations on health care reform. Guard against harming Medicare or company-sponsored health care benefits that retirees have earned.
• Health care reform legislation should prevent broken promises to retirees by providing what the NRLN calls a Maintenance of Cost Payment (MCP). The MCP would establish a fixed monthly payment to retirees equivalent to the dollar value of benefits an employer provided at retirement, prior to the reduction or cancellation of retirement benefits such as health care, prescription drugs, life insurance, long-term care, catastrophic coverage and other benefits. The MCP would be use to purchase replacement coverage for as much of the lost benefits as possible. Under the NRLN's proposal, companies would be entitled to tax credits to encourage them to continue to offer defined benefit plans or provide the MCP.
• Don't tax retirees for the health care benefits they may still receive from their former employer.
• Support the NRLN's position that any health care reform bill developed by Congress should include a Public Plan Option.
• The NRLN's vision of a Public Plan Option is simply having a portion of an overall health plan offered directly by the government, just as the Medicare plan is today, to compete with plans offered by private insurance companies.
• Building on Medicare as the Public Plan Option is the most cost efficient way to bring about cost savings without overturning the expectations and services offered to the 44 million people already on Medicare.
• In short, efficiencies can be created within the current Medicare structure that is not broken.
• The government should not own clinics and hospitals; should not exercise control over doctors nor ration health care.
• When an employer eliminates its health care plan, retirees usually lose "catastrophic coverage" which limits out- of-pocket medical expenses to a fixed amount, such as $1,500. Given this loss, the NRLN believes that catastrophic coverage should be added to Medicare.
• It is difficult for many men and women age 50 to 64 who have been laid off or retired early-either forced or voluntary-to purchase affordable health care insurance because of their age. They should be allowed to buy into Medicare at a cost that does not burden the system.
• Funding should be provided in health care reform legislation to eliminate the "doughnut hole" in the Medicare Part D prescription drug plan.
• If Congress is serious about reducing health care costs, it should pass bills that already exist that call for importation of prescription drugs, competitive bidding by makers of prescription drugs and funding the FDA to reduce generic drug backlogs; and stopping drug companies from making payoffs to generic manufacturers who withhold new generic drugs.

Go to www.nrln.org  and click on the link to read the NRLN's complete Legislative Agenda.