 |

 |
|
George has
been notifying
former works
employees
about things
that are of
importance to
them for a
number of
years now.
We will try to
keep the most
current things
that affect us
here as a
reference for
those to refer
to. Our
benefits and
legislation
actions are of
the most
important to
us right now.
|
| |
|
NRLN Agency
Offering
Quality
Insurance
Plans for 2012
The NRLN
Agency is
continuing to
be responsive
to NRLN
Grassroots
Network
Members who
have stated in
NRLN surveys
that the NRLN
should inform
them of health
care insurance
plans. Through
a new website
and new
partner,
Mature Health
Center, the
NRLN Agency is
making access
available to
premium quotes
on 2012
insurance
plans for
health care,
prescription
drugs,
long-term
care, and
dental
discounts.
There are
Medicare
Supplement
Insurance (Medigap)
plans and
health care
plans for
pre-age-65
individuals
and family
members.
Medicare
Supplement
Insurance (Medigap)
plans help pay
some of the
health care
costs that
Medicare
doesn't cover.
A participant
in Medicare
may change his
or her Medigap
plan at any
time. The
enrollment
period for a
2012 Medicare
Part D
prescription
drug plan or a
Medicare
Advantage plan
is October 15
to December 7,
2011. Because
the federal
government is
reducing the
subsidy that
it pays to
Medicare
Advantage
plans, the
NRLN Agency
has elected
not to offer
them.
Click here
to access the
NRLN website
at
www.nrln.org
and click on
the
"Insurance"
tab on the far
right near the
top of the
home page to
link to the
NRLN Agency
insurance
website. To
speak with a
Mature Health
Center
designated
representative,
call toll free
at
1-877-631-2843.
Tell the
representative
that you are a
member of the
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network (NRLN).
You may also
send an email
with your
questions to
Mature Health
Center at
kori@maturehealthcenter.com
.
The NRLN
Agency is
governed by
five NRLN
Board Members.
The NRLN does
not fund or
financially
support Agency
operations
with retiree
association or
individual
dues. The
Agency may
receive market
access fees
that flow
directly to
the NRLN as
contributions
that support
you.
In order to
protect you
from receiving
insurance
company
nusance mail,
the NRLN
Agency has
final approval
authority of
materials and
in-house
control over
the printing
and mailing of
materials you
may receive
from Mature
Health Center
and our
mailing list
will not be
made available
to them.
Check out the
website and
get your
questions
answered. Any
information
submitted to
obtain a quote
will be kept
private. If
you have
feedback for
the NRLN
Agency, send
it to
nrlnmessage@msn.com
.
NRLN Agency
Board |
| |
|
NRLN Action
Alert
"Super
Committee"
And
Congress
Must
Protect
Retirees
You may
have read
my NRLN
President's
Forum
message
sent to you
on October
8th in
which I
asked you
to read a
copy of my
letter to
each of the
12 members
of the
Congressional
Joint
Select
Committee
on Deficit
Reduction,
the
so-called
"Super
Committee."
I have
received a
number of
emails from
NRLN
Grassroots
Network
Members
saying they
agree with
the NRLN's
proposals
stated in
the
five-page
letter.
Now, your
help is
needed to
inform all
members of
Congress
about some
of the key
points in
the NRLN's
letter. I
am asking
you to send
the NRLN's
sample
letter
(copy
below) to
your
Representative
and
Senators.
-
Click
here to
access the
NRLN
Action
Alert.
Look for
the Action
Alert
headline:
"SUPER
COMMITTEE"
AND
CONGRESS
MUST
PROTECT
RETIREES.
Then click
on the
"Take
Action"
button. On
the next
screen,
type in
your zip
code and
click "GO"
to
identify
your
elected
representatives
and access
the sample
letter to
email to
Washington.
-
If you
have a
problem
accessing
the Action
Alert with
the above
link, go
to
www.nrln.org
and click
on the
"Take
Action
Now" link
near the
top of the
NRLN home
page.
-
It would
also help
to print
out a copy
of the
letter to
the "Super
Committee"
from the
NRLN
website
and take
it to your
Representative's
and
Senators'
local/area
office.
Click
here
to access
the
letter.
Adobe®
Reader® is
required
to view
and print
out the
newsletter.
If you do
not have
this
software
on your
computer,
click here
to
download
it free.Call
the
local/area
office and
request an
appointment
with the
lawmaker,
if
possible,
or a
senior
staff
member.
Click
here
to access
the NRLN
website
to find
your
Representative's
and
Senators'
office
locations
and phone
numbers.
If your
Representative
or Senator
is one of
the members
of the
"Super
Committee"
it is
especially
important
that you
email the
NRLN's
sample
letter and
take the
five-page
letter to
his or her
office. The
members of
the "Super
Committee"
are:
Senators
Patty
Murray
(D-WA)
Democratic
Co-Chair,
Max Baucus
(D-MT),
John Kerry
(D-MA), Jon
Kyl (R-AZ),
Rob Portman
(R-OH), and
Pat Toomey
(R-PA); and
Representatives
Jeb
Hensarling
(R-TX-05),
Republican
Co-Chair,
Dave Camp
(R-MI-04),
Fred Upton
(R-MI-06),
Xavier
Becerra
(D-CA-31),
James
Clyburn
(D-SC-06),
and Chris
Van Hollen
(D-MD-08).
Bill
Kadereit,
President
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
---------------------------------------------------
Sample
Letter:
Dear
Representative
_____________:
or Dear
Senator
____________:
As one of
your
constituents,
I am
writing to
you about
the work of
the Joint
Select
Committee
on Deficit
Reduction.
On October
5th, Bill
Kadereit,
President
of the
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network (NRLN)
faxed to
each member
of the
"Super
Committee"
a five-page
letter
urging them
to protect
Social
Security
and
Medicare
and reduce
the federal
deficit by
enacting
legislation
to reduce
the cost of
prescription
drugs.
I want to
let you
know that I
support the
NRLN's
positions
and through
this letter
I am
sharing
with you
some of the
NRLN's key
points. I
urge you to
read the
entire NRLN
letter to
the "Super
Committee"
members. It
is posted
on the NRLN
website at:
http://www.nrln.org/BKLETTERS/NRLN%20Ltr%20Super%20Committee%20All%20Members.pdf
. Ask your
colleagues
on the
"Super
Committee"
to support
the NRLN's
proposals.
Social
Security
and
Medicare
are not
welfare
programs.
My employer
and I paid
payroll
taxes to
earn these
benefits
for my
retirement
years. It
galls me
when I hear
members of
Congress
call them
"entitlements."
Social
Security
and
Medicare
are
covenants
with
Americans
and the
benefits
must be
protected
and not
reduced by
possible
recommendations
from the
"Super
Committee"
that must
be voted on
by all
members of
Congress.
Social
Security
and
Medicare
did not
cause the
federal
budget
deficit.
The real
issue is
that rising
costs in
areas such
as
prescription
drugs and
wasteful,
unnecessary
programs in
other areas
of the
federal
budget have
inflated
the
nation's
deficit.
The
Congressional
Budget
Office (CBO)
reported in
August 2011
that Social
Security
and
Medicare
combined
account for
less than
$50 billion
of the
projected
$1.3
trillion
deficit in
2011. These
figures do
not point
to Social
Security
and
Medicare as
the real
culprits in
the deficit
crisis.
I am asking
that you
support the
following
NRLN
proposals
and urge
your
colleagues
on the
"Super
Committee"
to do
likewise:
On
Social
Security:
-
Close the
Social
Security
long-range
funding
gap
through
modest
increases
in the
payroll
tax rate
and
increasing
the cap on
maximum
wages
subject to
the tax,
which is
currently
$106,800 a
year.
-
Don't
change the
way the
annual
Cost-Of-Living
Adjustment
(COLA) is
calculated
for Social
Security.
Switching
to the
proposed
Chained
Consumer
Price
Index
(CPI)
would be a
deceptive
way to
reduce
benefits
because
retirees
have
higher
health
care costs
than other
Americans.
-
Don't
increase
the age
for Social
Security
eligibility
and full
benefits.
A higher
Social
Security
retirement
age will
require
Americans
to attempt
to remain
employed
when
private
sector
employers
favor
younger
rather
than older
workers.
-
Make the
Social
Security
Trust Fund
a
"lockbox"
to prevent
Congress
from
spending
the
payroll
tax
dollars
for other
purposes.
On
Medicare:
-
Avoid any
reductions
in
Medicare
benefits
that could
negatively
impact the
care that
current
and future
retirees
receive
from
doctors,
hospitals
and other
health
care
services.
Medicare
benefits
have
become a
fundamental
financial
security
program
for
assisting
seniors
with their
health
care.
-
Make
prosecution
of
Medicare
fraud a
high
priority
with
prison
time for
those
convicted.
Centers
for
Medicare
and
Medicaid
Services
(CMS)
estimates
that $48
billion of
Medicare’s
total
outlays
went to
improper
payments,
including
fraudulent
ones.
-
Set fair
and
equitable
rate
formulae
for
determining
physician
fees and
make
adjustments
up or down
annually.
Examine
costly
referrals
and
redundant
visit
practices
and
disallow
them.
-
Congress
must
increase
the
Medicare
tax on
workers
and
employers
until such
time as
taxes can
again fund
60% to 65%
of the
Medicare
budget
-
Pass
legislation
that would
compel
safe
importation,
competitive
bidding,
funding to
accelerate
generic
drug sales
and
eliminate
non-competitive
practices
in the
prescription
drug
industry.
Research
by the
NRLN
indicates
that if
Congress
acts to
implement
these
initiatives,
the
nation’s
$4,060
billion in
projected
prescription
drug
expenditures
over the
next ten
years can
be reduced
by 18%.
This 18%
savings
would
amount to
$730
billion.
-
Pass
these
bills to
reduce the
cost of
Medicare,
the budget
deficit
and lower
the cost
of
prescription
drugs for
Americans:
S.
319:
Pharmaceutical
Market
Access and
Drug Safety
Act of 2011
S.
44:
Medicare
Prescription
Drug Price
Negotiation
Act of 2011
and
H.R. 2248:
Medicare Prescription
Drug Price
Negotiation
Act of 2011
S.
27:
Preserve
Access to
Affordable
Generics
Act of 2011
-
Encourage
your
colleagues
in the
House to
introduce
companion
bills for
S. 319 and
S. 27.
The "Super
Committee"
and the
entire
Congress
have an
opportunity
to
safeguard
the
covenant
with
current and
future
retirees.
Do what is
right to
protect
retirement
financial
security.
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
Insights Into New
Health Care
Law
September
2010
I enjoy
reading the
various
Retiree
Association
newsletters
that I
receive.
When reading
the latest
newsletter
from the
Association
of US West
Retirees
Colorado/Wyoming
group, I was
impressed by
a column
written by
Barbara
Wilcox. The
column
responded to
questions
from US
West/Qwest
retirees
about the
new national
health care
law.
I've met
Barbara at
AUSWR
meetings and
know she is
an
experienced
researcher.
I called
Barbara and
received her
approval to
share her
column with
NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members
through an
email and by
posting it
on the NRLN
website at
www.nrln.org
. I think
you will see
below that
the
questions
from US
West/Qwest
retirees are
similar to
questions
that many
other NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members have
about the
new health
care law. I
think many
of you will
be
interested
in Barbara's
answers.
The
references
to Qwest
were changed
to the word
"Company" so
that you
might more
readily
identify
with the
questions
and answers
for your own
personal
situation
regarding
the new
health care
law.
I also asked
Barbara if
she would
consider
researching
answers to
questions
from NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members that
I could
periodically
share with
NRLN email
"subscribers."
Although
Barbara is
very busy
with a
number of
volunteer
projects,
she said she
would search
out answers
as her time
permits. If
you have
questions
about the
new health
care law,
send them to
nrlnmessage@msn.com
. Don't
expect an
immediate
personal
response.
The NRLN
will gather
the
questions
and group
those that
are similar
before
forwarding
them to
Barbara.
Barbara will
include
these NRLN
questions in
her future
columns, as
appropriate.
At the end
of Barbara's
column, I
inserted the
health care
law
implementation
timeline
from the
Kaiser
Foundation
website. At
the very
end, Barbara
has listed a
number of
websites
that are
good
resources
for
information
about the
health care
law. If you
don't find
the answer
to your
questions on
one of those
websites,
send your
questions to
the NRLN.
Bill
Kadereit,
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
-------------------------------------------------
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network (NRLN)
A Review of
the Patient
Protection
and
Affordable
Health Act
of 2010
By Barbara
Wilcox,
Association
of U.S. West
Retirees (AUSWR)–
NRLN
Association
The Q’s and
A’s and
other
information
provided
below were
developed to
provide
information
on changes
that
potentially
impact us as
retirees, as
a result of
passage of
The
Patient
Protection
and
Affordable
Health Act (PPAHA)
of 2010.
Comments are
made with
references
to current
insurance
coverage but
company
plans are
subject to
change at
annual
enrollment
time.
This review
includes the
Q’s and A’s
followed by
the detailed
PPAHA
timeline as
published by
the Kaiser
Family
Foundation.
Also,
several
useful
sources are
recommended
at the end
of this
review.
IMPACT OF
HEALTH CARE
LAW:
General:
Q-1. What
changes
might the
new law make
in the
health care
benefits
Companies
provide
retirees?
A.
The new law
makes no
changes in
what
Companies
are required
to provide
to retirees.
Q-2. But, I
thought the
new law
required
large
employers to
either cover
the people
who work for
them or pay
a penalty.
A.
YES, that’s
true for
active
employees.
But, the
new law
makes NO
requirement
that
employers
cover
retirees.
You Are Not
on Medicare
Yet:
Q-3. I’m a
retiree, but
I’m not yet
65, so I’m
not eligible
for
Medicare. My
Company is
providing my
health care.
Is there
anything in
the new law
that
benefits me?
A.
YES. There
is a
temporary
reinsurance
program for
retirees age
55-64. The
Federal
Government
will begin
subsidizing
the costs of
the health
care claims
filed under
your
Company-provided
health
insurance by
paying 80%
of costs
between
$15,000 and
$90,000.
This subsidy
is supposed
to reduce
your costs
and it will
also reduce
company
costs.
Because of
the cost
reduction,
this is a
significant
incentive
for
Companies to
continue to
provide your
health
insurance.
Once the new
Health
Insurance
Exchanges
are
operating,
in 2014,
this subsidy
ends, and
retirees in
your
situation
will be able
to purchase
insurance on
the Exchange
if they
choose to do
so.
You Are On
Medicare:
Q-4. I’m on
Medicare.
Will the new
law make
changes for
me?
A.
YES. It
depends on
whether you
are on
traditional
Medicare or
a Medicare
Advantage
plan exactly
what changes
you may
experience.
Q-5. How do
I know which
kind of
Medicare I’m
on? I just
chose from
the options
my Company
gave me at
open
enrollment.
A.
If you were
with a HMO
(Health
Maintenance
Organization),
you most
likely
enrolled in
that HMO’s
Medicare
Advantage
plan when
you became
eligible for
Medicare.
Companies
may offer
different
HMOs in
different
geographical
locations.
If you are
not in one
of these
HMOs, you
probably
have
traditional
Medicare.
Traditional
Medicare
Changes:
Q-6. I’m on
traditional
Medicare.
Will I have
changes?
A.
YES. There
are several
enhancements
being made
to
traditional
Medicare. A
number of
preventive
services,
such as
annual
physicals,
mammograms,
colonoscopies,
will be
covered free
of charge,
beginning
1/1/2011.
There will
be new
programs to
provide
coordination
of care if
you are
hospitalized
or have a
chronic
condition.
Reimbursements
to primary
care doctors
and general
surgeons
will be
increased by
10% for five
years, so
there should
be more of
these
doctors for
you to
choose from.
Medicare
Advantage
Plan
Changes:
Q-7. I’ve
heard that
Medicare
Advantage
plans will
go away, or
will get
more
expensive.
Is this
true?
A.
NO & MAYBE.
The Medicare
Advantage
program is
not going
away. Up
until now,
these plans
have enjoyed
a larger
subsidy from
the Federal
government
than
traditional
Medicare,
and that
will be
phased-down
to equal the
subsidy to
traditional
Medicare.
The private
companies
that offer
Medicare
Advantage
may make
changes as a
result. For
example,
they may
take away
some of the
perks
they’ve
offered in
the past,
such as
health club
memberships.
They may
also charge
higher
premiums or
co-pays, but
that is
nothing new.
These plans
are required
to offer
benefits at
least as
good as
traditional
Medicare.
Tricare for
Veterans:
Q-8. I am a
veteran and
am on
Tricare.
Will there
be any
changes for
me?
A.
NO. Defense
Secretary
Gates has
issued a
statement
saying that
Tricare
meets all of
the
requirements
of the new
health care
law.
FINANCING OF
HEALTH CARE
LAW:
Q-9. Is it
true that
money is
being taken
from
Medicare to
pay for
covering the
uninsured?
A.
The new law
contains a
provision
requiring
that any
savings in
Medicare go
to reduce
patient
costs,
improve
Medicare
benefits,
protect
patients’
access to
providers
(doctors)
and extend
solvency of
the Medicare
Trust Fund.
In
2011-2013,
money is
being taken
from the
Medicare
Advantage
programs
until the
Federal
subsidies of
that program
are matched
to subsidies
of
traditional
Medicare.
This money,
along with
other
Medicare
savings,
will be used
to enhance
basic
Medicare
benefits and
extend the
life of
Medicare.
Overall, the
solvency of
the Medicare
Trust Fund
will be
extended by
nearly a
decade,
according to
the
Congressional
Budget
Office. But,
since some
of the money
won’t be
needed until
later years,
it will be
“loaned” via
special
Treasury
bills to pay
for
Non-Medicare
expenses,
such as
coverage for
the
uninsured.
Q-10. Large
companies,
such as
AT&T, Deere
& Co., and
Verizon,
announced in
March that
they may cut
prescription
drug
coverage for
Medicare-eligible
retirees
because
their
federal
subsidy from
the Medicare
Part D
program will
no longer be
tax-free.
Will this
tax change
affect the
prescription
drug
benefits of
my Companies
retirees?
A.
Since the
Medicare D
prescription
drug program
was started
in 2006,
employers
have been
given a 28%
tax free
subsidy to
encourage
them to
provide
prescription
drug
coverage to
their
Medicare
eligible
employees
and
retirees.
Some
Companies
reported the
future loss
of the tax
benefit on
the subsidy
in first
quarter
financial
results,
which
indicates
that they
will
continue to
provide the
Medicare
prescription
drug
coverage.
Employers
will still
get the 28%
subsidy, but
it will no
longer be
tax-free.
Still the
subsidy is a
good
incentive
for
Companies to
keep the
prescription
drug
coverage.
None of us
can predict
what our
Companies
will do.
But, it
seems
unlikely
that this
tax change
would cause
most
Companies to
drop
prescription
drug
coverage.
Q-11. I’ve
heard that
“Cadillac”
health plans
are going to
be taxed.
Will that
apply to the
health care
insurance we
retirees get
from our
Companies?
A.
It will not
apply to
those of us
who are on
Medicare,
because most
Companies
only
supplement
our Medicare
coverage.
For those
not yet on
Medicare in
2018, when
the tax on
high value
plans
begins, it
will depend
on what your
insurance
premium
level is
(retiree
plus Company
cost, not
including
dental
insurance).
The
threshold
for persons
over 55 will
be $11,850
annually for
single
coverage and
$30,950 for
a family.
Q-12. Are
there any
other new
taxes that
are likely
to hit
retirees?
A.
That depends
on your
individual
circumstances
and income
levels. For
individuals
with
adjusted
gross income
over
$200,000 or
$250,000 for
couples, a
3.8%
Medicare tax
will be
assessed on
investment
income. For
those at
this income
level who
are still
working,
there also
will be an
additional
0.9% payroll
tax. These
taxes begin
in 2013.
Q-13. What
are the
changes in
the way
deductions
can be taken
for health
care
expenses?
A.
In 2013, the
threshold
for itemized
deductions
of
out-of-pocket
medical
expenses
will
increase
from 7.5% of
adjusted
gross income
to 10%. For
those 65 and
older, this
increase is
postponed
until 2017.
The Truth
About Some
Myths:
Q-14. I
received an
email saying
that we
would have
to pay
income tax
on the value
of my
Company-provided
health
insurance.
Is this
true?
A.
NO. There is
confusion,
because the
Affordable
Care Act
does require
that
employers
begin
reporting
the value of
the health
insurance
they provide
on
employees’
W-2 forms.
But
individuals
do not pay
income taxes
on that
value.
Health
insurance
could be
taxed in the
future if
the value
exceeds
certain
limits, but
the
insurance
Company will
pay the tax,
not the
insured
person. (See
discussion
of Cadillac
plans in
Q-11.)
Q-15. I
heard that
the health
care reform
law has a
new real
estate tax
in it.
They’re
saying that,
if I sell my
home, I’ll
have to pay
a 3.8% sales
tax. Is this
true?
A.
NO. There is
no real
estate or
sales tax in
the
Affordable
Care Act.
There is a
3.8% income
tax on
investment
income
beginning in
2013, but
only for
individuals
earning more
than
$200,000 or
couples
earning more
than
$250,000.
So, if you
fall in that
high income
bracket, and
you sell
your house,
you might
have to pay
the 3.8%
tax, on any
gain you
made over
and above
the cost of
the house,
depending on
other
details in
your
earnings.
RULEMAKING:
The Federal
Department
of Health
and Human
Services (HHS)
is
conducting
rule-making
procedures
to set the
specifics of
how each
provision of
the new law
will be
implemented.
New Rules
for
Medicare:
Q-16. What
new benefits
are added to
Medicare in
2011?
A. As of
January 1,
2011,
Medicare
will cover
many
preventive
services at
no expense
to the
patient,
including
annual
wellness
visits with
your primary
care
physician.
Q-17. What
other
changes are
happening in
Medicare
next
January?
A. Rules
have been
issued for
providing
increased
payment to
primary care
doctors and
surgeons.
New Rules
for
Grandfathered
Plans:
Q-18. Is the
health
insurance we
get from our
Company
considered
to be
grandfathered,
under the
new law?
A. YES,
right now it
is an
existing,
grandfathered
plan.
Q-19. As a
grandfathered
plan, will
our
insurance
have to make
any changes
under the
new law?
A.
YES. The
Affordable
Care Act
does make
certain
requirements
of all
health
insurance
plans,
regardless
of whether
they are
existing
plans or new
plans. These
rules are
known as the
Patients’
Bill of
Rights,
which takes
effect for
plan years
beginning
after Sept.
23, 2010.
Depending on
the exact
plan you are
on, here are
some key
provisions
that may
cause
improvements
in your
insurance:
-
No lifetime
limits on
coverage.
-
Phase out
of annual
dollar-amount
limits on
coverage.
-
Extension
of parents’
coverage of
young
adults up
to age 26.
Q-20. Will a
Company-provided
insurance
always be
grandfathered?
A. The rules
list a
number of
changes to a
plan that
would cause
it to lose
grandfathered
status. For
example, the
plan cannot
significantly
cut or
reduce
benefits or
increase
deductibles
or co-pays
beyond
specified
amounts.
Neither can
the employer
offering the
plan tighten
or decrease
its cap on
the amount
of premium
the employer
pays.
Q-21. If my
Company-provided
insurance
should lose
its
grandfathered
status, what
happens?
A. Then the
Company
would have
to meet
additional
requirements
that any new
plan has to
meet. For
example,
they would
have to
provide
specified
preventive
care at no
cost to you.
National
Healthcare
Reform
Implementation
Timeline
This Kaiser
Family
Foundation
implementation
timeline
reflects the
provisions
of the
Patient
Protection
and
Affordable
Care Act,
which
President
Obama signed
on March 23,
2010, as
well as
provisions
in the
Health Care
& Education
Reconciliation
Act, which
was signed
on March 30,
2010. Major
provisions
of the acts
will be
implemented
during the
2010 – 2014
but a few
important
provisions
are
scheduled to
take effect
in 2015 or
later.
2010
Insurance
Reforms
-
Establish a
temporary
national
high-risk
pool to
provide
health
coverage to
individuals
with
pre-existing
medical
conditions.
(Effective
90 days
following
enactment
until
January 1,
2014)
-
Provide
dependent
coverage
for adult
children up
to age 26
for all
individual
and group
policies.
-
Prohibit
individual
and group
health
plans from
placing
lifetime
limits on
the dollar
value of
coverage
and prior
to 2014,
plans may
only impose
annual
limits on
coverage as
determined
by the
Secretary.
Prohibit
insurers
from
rescinding
coverage
except in
cases of
fraud and
prohibit
pre-existing
condition
exclusions
for
children.
-
Require
qualified
health
plans to
provide at
a minimum
coverage
without
cost-sharing
for
preventive
services
rated A or
B by the
U.S.
Preventive
Services
Task Force,
recommended
immunizations,
preventive
care for
infants,
children,
and
adolescents,
and
additional
preventive
care and
screenings
for women.
-
Provide tax
credits to
small
employers
with no
more than
25
employees
and average
annual
wages of
less than
$50,000
that
purchase
health
insurance
for
employees.
-
Create a
temporary
reinsurance
program for
employers
providing
health
insurance
coverage to
retirees
over age 55
who are not
eligible
for
Medicare.
(Effective
90 days
following
enactment
until
January 1,
2014)
-
Require
health
plans to
report the
proportion
of premium
dollars
spent on
clinical
services,
quality,
and other
costs and
provide
rebates to
consumers
for the
amount of
the premium
spent on
clinical
services
and quality
that is
less than
85% for
plans in
the large
group
market and
80% for
plans in
the
individual
and small
group
markets.
(Requirement
to report
medical
loss ratio
effective
plan year
2010;
requirement
to provide
rebates
effective
January 1,
2011)
-
Establish a
process for
reviewing
increases
in health
plan
premiums
and require
plans to
justify
increases.
Require
states to
report on
trends in
premium
increases
and
recommend
whether
certain
plan should
be excluded
from the
Exchange
based on
unjustified
premium
increases.
Medicare
-
Provide a
$250 rebate
to Medicare
beneficiaries
who reach
the Part D
coverage
gap in 2010
and
gradually
eliminate
the
Medicare
Part D
coverage
gap by
2020.
-
Expand
Medicare
coverage to
individuals
who have
been
exposed to
environmental
health
hazards
from living
in an area
subject to
an
emergency
declaration
made as of
June 17,
2009 and
have
developed
certain
health
conditions
as a
result.
-
Improve
care
coordination
for dual
eligibles
by creating
a new
office
within the
Centers for
Medicare
and
Medicaid
services,
the Federal
Coordinated
Health Care
Office.
-
Reduce
annual
market
basket
updates for
inpatient
and
outpatient
hospital
services,
long-term
care
hospitals,
inpatient
rehabilitation
facilities,
and
psychiatric
hospitals
and units.
-
Ban new
physician-owned
hospitals
in
Medicare,
requiring
hospitals
to have a
provider
agreement
in effect
by December
31; limit
the growth
of certain
grandfathered
physician-owned
hospitals.
Medicaid
-
Create a
state
option to
cover
childless
adults
though a
Medicaid
state plan
amendment.
-
Create a
state
option to
provide
Medicaid
coverage
for family
planning
services up
to the
highest
level of
eligibility
for
pregnant
women to
certain
low-income
individuals
through a
Medicaid
state plan
amendment.
-
Create a
new option
for states
to provide
Children's
Health
Insurance
Program
(CHIP)
coverage to
children of
state
employees
eligible
for health
benefits if
certain
conditions
are met.
-
Increase
the
Medicaid
drug rebate
percentage
for brand
name drugs
to 23.1%
(except the
rebate for
clotting
factors and
drugs
approved
exclusively
for
pediatric
use
increases
to 17.1%);
increase
the
Medicaid
rebate for
non-innovator,
multiple
source
drugs to
13% of
average
manufacturer
price; and
extend the
drug rebate
to Medicaid
managed
care plans.
-
Provide
funding for
and expand
the role of
the
Medicaid
and CHIP
Payment and
Access
Commission
to include
assessments
of adult
services
(including
those
dually
eligible
for
Medicare
and
Medicaid).
-
Require the
Secretary
of HHS to
issue
regulations
to
establish a
process for
public
notice and
comment for
section
1115
waivers in
Medicaid
and CHIP.
Prescription
Drugs
-
Authorize
the Food
and Drug
Administration
to approve
generic
versions of
biologic
drugs and
grant
biologics
manufacturers
12 years of
exclusive
use before
generics
can be
developed.
Quality
Improvement
-
Support
comparative
effectiveness
research by
establishing
a
non-profit
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
Research
Institute.
-
Establish a
commissioned
Regular
Corps and a
Ready
Reserve
Corps for
service in
time of a
national
emergency.
-
Reauthorize
and amend
the Indian
Health Care
Improvement
Act.
Workforce
-
Establish
the
Workforce
Advisory
Committee
to develop
a national
workforce
strategy.
-
Increase
workforce
supply and
support
training of
health
professionals
through
scholarships
and loans.
Tax Changes
-
Impose
additional
requirements
on
non-profit
hospitals.
Impose a
tax of
$50,000 per
year for
failure to
meet these
requirements.
-
Limit the
deductibility
of
executive
and
employee
compensation
to $500,000
per
applicable
individual
for health
insurance
providers.
-
Impose a
tax of 10%
on the
amount paid
for indoor
tanning
services.
-
Exclude
unprocessed
fuels from
the
definition
of
cellulosic
biofuel for
purposes of
applying
the
cellulosic
biofuel
producer
credit.
-
Clarify
application
of the
economic
substance
doctrine
and
increase
penalties
for
underpayments
attributable
to a
transaction
lacking
economic
substance.
2011
Long-term
Care
-
Establish a
national,
voluntary
insurance
program for
purchasing
community
living
assistance
services
and
supports
(CLASS
program).
Medical
Malpractice
-
Award
five-year
demonstration
grants to
states to
develop,
implement,
and
evaluate
alternatives
to current
tort
litigations.
Prevention/Wellness
-
Eliminate
cost-sharing
for
Medicare
covered
preventive
services
that are
recommended
(rated A or
B) by the
U.S.
Preventive
Services
Task Force
and waive
the
Medicare
deductible
for
colorectal
cancer
screening
tests.
Authorize
the
Secretary
to modify
or
eliminate
Medicare
coverage of
preventive
services
based on
recommendations
of the U.S.
Preventive
Services
Task Force.
-
Provide
Medicare
beneficiaries
access to a
comprehensive
health risk
assessment
and
creation of
a
personalized
prevention
plan and
provide
incentives
to Medicare
and
Medicaid
beneficiaries
to complete
behavior
modification
programs.
-
Provide
grants for
up to five
years to
small
employers
that
establish
wellness
programs.
-
Establish
the
National
Prevention,
Health
Promotion
and Public
Health
Council to
develop a
national
strategy to
improve the
nation's
health.
-
Require
chain
restaurants
and food
sold from
vending
machines to
disclose
the
nutritional
content of
each item.
Medicare
-
Require
pharmaceutical
manufacturers
to provide
a 50%
discount on
brand-name
prescriptions
filled in
the
Medicare
Part D
coverage
gap
beginning
in 2011 and
begin
phasing-in
federal
subsidies
for generic
prescriptions
filled in
the
Medicare
Part D
coverage
gap.
-
Provide 10%
Medicare
bonus pay
to primary
care
physicians,
and general
surgeons
practicing
in health
professional
shortage
areas.
(Effective
2011
through
2015)
-
Restructure
payments to
Medicare
Advantage
plans by
setting
payments
to different
percentages
of Medicare
fee-for-service
rates.
-
Prohibit
Medicare
Advantage
plans from
imposing
higher
cost-sharing
requirements
for some
Medicare
covered
benefits
than is
required
under the
traditional
fee-for-service
program.
-
Provide
Medicare
payments to
qualifying
hospitals
in counties
with the
lowest
quartile
Medicare
spending
for 2011
and 2012.
-
Freeze the
income
threshold
for
income-related
Medicare
Part B
premiums
for 2011
through
2019 at
2010
levels, and
reduce the
Medicare
Part D
premium
subsidy for
those with
incomes
above
$85,000/individual
and
$170,000/couple.
-
Create an
Innovation
Center
within the
Centers for
Medicare
and
Medicaid
Services.
Medicaid
-
Prohibit
federal
payments
for
Medicaid
services
related to
health care
acquired
conditions.
-
Create a
new
Medicaid
state plan
option to
permit
Medicaid to
states
enrollees
with at
least two
chronic
conditions,
one
condition
and risk of
developing
another, or
at least
one serious
and
persistent
mental
health
condition
to
designate a
provider as
a health
home.
Provide
states
taking up
the option
with 90%
FMAP for
two years
for health
home
related
services
including
care
management,
care
coordination
and health
promotion.
-
Create the
State
Balancing
Incentive
Program in
Medicaid to
provide
enhanced
federal
matching
payments to
increase
non-institutionally
based
long-term
care
services.
-
Establish
the
Community
First
Choice
Option in
Medicaid to
provide
community-based
attendant
support
services to
certain
people with
disabilities.
Quality
Improvement
-
Develop a
national
quality
improvement
strategy
that
includes
priorities
to improve
the
delivery of
health care
services,
patient
health
outcomes,
and
population
health.
-
Establish
the
Community-based
Collaborative
Care
Network
Program to
support
consortiums
of health
care
providers
to
coordinate
and
integrate
health care
services,
for
low-income
uninsured
and
underinsured
populations.
-
Establish a
new trauma
center
program to
strengthen
emergency
department
and trauma
center
capacity.
-
Improve
access to
care by
increasing
funding by
$11 billion
for
community
health
centers and
by $1.5
billion for
the
National
Health
Service
Corps over
five years;
establish
new
programs to
support
school-based
health
centers and
nurse-managed
health
clinics.
Workforce
-
Establish
Teaching
Health
Centers to
provide
payments
for primary
care
residency
programs in
community-based
ambulatory
patient
care
centers.
Tax Changes
-
Exclude the
costs for
over-the-counter
drugs not
prescribed
by a doctor
from being
reimbursed
through a
health
reimbursement
account or
health
flexible
spending
account and
from being
reimbursed
on a
tax-free
basis
through a
health
savings
account or
Archer
medical
savings
account.
-
Increase
the tax on
distributions
from a
health
savings
account or
an Archer
MSA that
are not
used for
qualified
medical
expenses to
20% of the
disbursed
amount.
-
Impose new
annual fees
on the
pharmaceutical
manufacturing
sector.
2012
Medicare
-
Make Part D
cost-sharing
for
full-benefit
dual
eligible
beneficiaries
receiving
home and
community-based
care
services
equal to
the
cost-sharing
for those
who receive
institutional
care.
-
Allows
providers
to organize
as
accountable
care
organizations
(ACOs) that
voluntarily
meet
quality
thresholds
to share in
the cost
savings
they
achieve for
the
Medicare
program.
-
Reduce
Medicare
payments
that would
otherwise
be made to
hospitals
by
specified
percentages
to account
for excess
(preventable)
hospital
readmissions.
-
Reduce
annual
market
basket
updates for
home health
agencies,
skilled
nursing
facilities,
hospices,
and other
Medicare
providers.
-
Create the
Medicare
Independence
at Home
demonstration
program.
-
Establish a
hospital
value-based
purchasing
program in
Medicare
and develop
plans to
implement
value-based
purchasing
programs
for skilled
nursing
facilities,
home health
agencies,
and
ambulatory
surgical
centers.
-
Provide
bonus
payments to
high-quality
Medicare
Advantage
plans.
-
Reduce
rebates for
Medicare
Advantage
plans.
Medicaid
-
Create new
demonstration
projects in
Medicaid to
pay bundled
payments
for
episodes of
care that
include
hospitalizations
(effective
January 1,
2012
through
December
31, 2016);
to make
global
capital
payments to
safety net
hospital
systems
(effective
fiscal
years 2010
through
2012); to
allow
pediatric
medical
providers
organized
as
accountable
care
organizations
to share in
cost-savings
(effective
January 1,
2012
through
December
31, 2016);
and to
provide
Medicaid
payments to
institutions
of mental
disease for
adult
enrollees
who require
stabilization
of an
emergency
condition
(effective
October 1,
2011
through
December
31, 2015).
Quality
Improvement
-
Require
enhanced
collection
and
reporting
of data on
race,
ethnicity,
sex,
primary
language,
disability
status, and
for
underserved
rural and
frontier
populations.
2013
Insurance
Reforms
-
Create the
Consumer
Operated
and
Oriented
Plan
(CO-OP)
program to
foster the
creation of
non-profit,
member-run
health
insurance
companies
in all 50
states and
the
District of
Columbia to
offer
qualified
health
plans.
(Appropriate
$6 billion
to finance
the program
and award
loans and
grants to
establish
CO-OPs by
July 1,
2013.)
-
Simplify
health
insurance
administration
by adopting
a single
set of
operating
rules for
eligibility
verification
and claims
status
(rules
adopted
July 1,
2011;
effective
January 1,
2013),
electronic
funds
transfers
and health
care
payment and
remittance
(rules
adopted
July 1,
2012;
effective
January 1,
2014), and
health
claims or
equivalent
encounter
information,
enrollment
and
disenrollment
in a health
plan,
health plan
premium
payments,
and
referral
certification
and
authorization
(rules
adopted
July 1,
2014;
effective
January 1,
2016).
Health
plans must
document
compliance
with these
standards
or face a
penalty of
no more
than $1 per
covered
life.
(Effective
April 1,
2014.)
Prevention/Wellness
-
Provide
states that
offer
Medicaid
coverage of
and remove
cost-sharing
for
preventive
services
recommended
(rated A or
B) by the
U.S.
Preventive
Services
Task Force
and
recommended
immunizations
with a one
percentage
point
increase in
the federal
medical
assistance
percentage
(FMAP) for
these
services.
Medicare
-
Begin
phasing-in
federal
subsidies
for
brand-name
prescriptions
filled in
the
Medicare
Part D
coverage
gap (to 25%
in 2020, in
addition to
the 50%
manufacturer
brand-name
discount).
-
Establish a
national
Medicare
pilot
program to
develop and
evaluate
paying a
bundled
payment for
acute,
inpatient
hospital
services,
physician
services,
outpatient
hospital
services,
and
post-acute
care
services
for an
episode of
care.
Medicaid
-
Increase
Medicaid
payments
for primary
care
services
provided by
primary
care
doctors for
2013 and
2014 with
100%
federal
funding.
Quality
Improvement
-
Require
disclosure
of
financial
relationships
between
health
entities,
including
physicians,
hospitals,
pharmacists,
other
providers,
and
manufacturers
and
distributors
of covered
drugs,
devices,
biological,
and medical
supplies.
Tax Changes
-
Increase
the
threshold
for the
itemized
deduction
for
unreimbursed
medical
expenses
from 7.5%
of adjusted
gross
income to
10% of
adjusted
gross
income for
regular tax
purposes;
waives
increase
for
individuals
age 65 and
older for
tax years
2013-2016.
-
Increase
the
Medicare
Part A
(hospital
insurance)
tax rate on
wages by
0.9% (from
1.45% to
2.35%) on
earnings
over
$200,000
for
individual
taxpayers
and
$250,000
for married
couples
filing
jointly and
impose a
3.8%
assessment
on unearned
income for
higher-income
taxpayers.
-
Limit the
amount of
contributions
to a
flexible
spending
account for
medical
expenses to
$2,500 per
year
increased
annually by
the cost of
living
adjustment.
-
Impose an
excise tax
of 2.3% on
the sale of
any taxable
medical
device.
-
Eliminate
the
tax-deduction
for
employers
who receive
Medicare
Part D
retiree
drug
subsidy
payments.
2014
Individual
and Employer
Requirements
-
Require
U.S.
citizens
and legal
residents
to have
qualifying
health
coverage
(phase-in
tax penalty
for those
without
coverage).
-
Assess
employers
with 50 or
more
employees
that do not
offer
coverage
and have at
least one
full-time
employee
who
receives a
premium tax
credit a
fee of
$2,000 per
full-time
employee,
excluding
the first
30
employees
from the
assessment.
Employers
with 50 or
more
employees
that offer
coverage
but have at
least one
full-time
employee
receiving a
premium tax
credit,
will pay
the lesser
of $3,000
for each
employee
receiving a
premium
credit or
$2,000 for
each
full-time
employee,
excluding
the first
30
employees
from the
assessment.
Require
employers
with more
than 200
employees
to
automatically
enroll
employees
into health
insurance
plans
offered by
the
employer.
Employees
may opt out
of
coverage.
Insurance
Reforms
-
Create
state-based
American
Health
Benefit
Exchanges
and Small
Business
Health
Options
Program
(SHOP)
Exchanges,
administered
by a
governmental
agency or
non-profit
organization,
through
which
individuals
and small
businesses
with up to
100
employees
can
purchase
qualified
coverage.
-
Require
guarantee
issue and
renewability
and allow
rating
variation
based only
on age
(limited to
3 to 1
ratio),
premium
rating
area,
family
composition,
and tobacco
use
(limited to
1.5. to 1
ratio) in
the
individual
and the
small group
market and
the
Exchanges.
-
Reduce the
out-of-pocket
limits for
those with
incomes up
to 400% FPL
to the
following
levels:
-
100-200%
FPL:
one-third
of the HSA
limits
($1,983/individual
and
$3,967/family
in 2010);
-
200-300%
FPL:
one-half
of the HSA
limits
($2,975/individual
and
$5,950/family
in 2010);
-
300-400%
FPL:
two-thirds
of the HSA
limits
($3,987/individual
and
$7,973/family
in 2010).
-
Limit
deductibles
for health
plans in
the small
group
market to
$2,000 for
individuals
and $4,000
for
families
unless
contributions
are offered
that offset
deductible
amounts
above these
limits.
-
Limit any
waiting
periods for
coverage to
90 days.
-
Create an
essential
health
benefits
package
that
provides a
comprehensive
set of
services,
covers at
least 60%
of the
actuarial
value of
the covered
benefits,
limits
annual
cost-sharing
to the
current law
HSA limits
($5,950/individual
and
$11,900/family
in 2010),
and is not
more
extensive
than the
typical
employer
plan.
-
Require the
Office of
Personnel
Management
to contract
with
insurers to
offer at
least two
multi-state
plans in
each
Exchange.
At least
one plan
must be
offered by
a
non-profit
entity and
at least
one plan
must not
provide
coverage
for
abortions
beyond
those
permitted
by federal
law.
-
Permit
states the
option to
create a
Basic
Health Plan
for
uninsured
individuals
with
incomes
between
133-200%
FPL who
would
otherwise
be eligible
to receive
premium
subsidies
in the
Exchange.
-
Allow
states the
option of
merging the
individual
and small
group
markets.
-
Create a
temporary
reinsurance
program to
collect
payments
from health
insurers in
the
individual
and group
markets to
provide
payments to
plans in
the
individual
market that
cover
high-risk
individuals.
-
Require
qualified
health
plans to
meet new
operating
standards
and
reporting
requirements.
Premium
Subsidies
-
Provide
refundable
and
advanceable
premium
credits and
cost
sharing
subsidies
to eligible
individuals
and
families
with
incomes
between
133-400%
FPL to
purchase
insurance
through the
Exchanges.
Medicare
-
Reduce the
out-of-pocket
amount that
qualifies
an enrollee
for
catastrophic
coverage in
Medicare
Part D
(effective
through
2019).
-
Establish
an
Independent
Payment
Advisory
Board
comprised
of 15
members to
submit
legislative
proposals
containing
recommendations
to reduce
the per
capita rate
of growth
in Medicare
spending if
spending
exceeds a
target
growth
rate.
-
Reduce
Medicare
Disproportionate
Share
Hospital (DSH)
payments
initially
by 75% and
subsequently
increase
payments
based on
the percent
of the
population
uninsured
and the
amount of
uncompensated
care
provided.
Require
Medicare
Advantage
plans to
have
medical
loss ratios
no lower
than 85%.
Medicaid
-
Expand
Medicaid to
all
non-Medicare
eligible
individuals
under age
65
(children,
pregnant
women,
parents,
and adults
without
dependent
children)
with
incomes up
to 133% FPL
based on
modified
adjusted
gross
income
(MAGI) and
provide
enhanced
federal
matching
for new
eligibles.
-
Reduce
states'
Medicaid
Disproportionate
Share
Hospital (DSH)
allotments.
-
Increase
spending
caps for
the
territories.
Prevention/Wellness
-
Permit
employers
to offer
employees
rewards of
up to 30%,
increasing
to 50% if
appropriate,
of the cost
of coverage
for
participating
in a
wellness
program and
meeting
certain
health-related
standards.
Establish
10-state
pilot
programs to
permit
participating
states to
apply
similar
rewards for
participating
in wellness
programs in
the
individual
market.
Tax Changes
-
Impose fees
on the
health
insurance
sector.
2015 and
later
Insurance
Reforms
-
Permit
states to
form health
care choice
compacts
and allow
insurers to
sell
policies in
any state
participating
in the
compact.
(Compacts
take effect
January 1,
2016.)
Medicare
-
Reduce
Medicare
payments to
certain
hospitals
for
hospital-acquired
conditions
by 1%.
(Effective
fiscal year
2015.)
Tax Changes
Impose an
excise tax
on insurers
of
employer-sponsored
health plans
with
aggregate
values that
exceed
$10,200 for
individual
coverage and
$27,500 for
family
coverage.
(Effective
January 1,
2018)
To read the
full text of
the Patient
Protection
and
Affordable
Health Care
Act, H.R.
3590: go to
http://thomas.gov
and check
Bill Number,
then enter
H.R. 3590
and click
Search.
For more
information
about the
new health
reform law,
the
following
sources are
recommended:
|
|
|
 |
|
Need Remains
to Cut
Prescription
Drug Costs
As most
people
enrolled in
Medicare
know,
Medicare
Part D
provides
prescription
drug
benefits to
Americans on
Medicare.
The standard
Medicare
Plan D
benefit
comes with a
$310
deductible.
After you've
spent $310,
you pay 25%
of the cost
of your
prescriptions
until the
total cost
of all the
medicine you
have
received in
a year hits
$2,830.
Then, you
are stuck
with 100% of
the bill
until the
total cost
of your
medicines
hits $6,440.
The gap when
Medicare
does not
cover the
cost of your
prescription
drugs is
known as the
"donut
hole."
According to
the U.S.
Department
of Health
and Human
Services,
Medicare
Part D
participants
who reach
the
prescription
drug "donut
hole" in
2010 will
receive a
$250 rebate
with the
checks
starting to
go out June
15, 2010.
There's no
application
process and
no private
company will
be involved
in getting
your rebate
check to you
if you are
eligible.
Beginning in
2011,
seniors in
the "donut
hole" will
receive a
50% discount
on
prescription
drugs. By
2015, you
will be
responsible
for 45% of
the cost; by
2018, your
share will
be reduced
to 35%. For
generic
drugs, your
costs will
be reduced
7% each
year,
beginning in
2011. In
2015, you
will pay 65%
of the cost
of generic
drugs; by
2018, you
will pay
44%.
Medicare's
share of
costs will
increase so
that the
"donut hole"
will be
completely
closed in
2020.
While the
NRLN did not
support or
oppose all
elements of
the new
health care
reform law,
we did and
still do
advocate
closing the
"donut
hole." But
closing the
"donut hole"
s is not a
solution for
getting
ever-escalating
prescription
drug costs
under
control for
retirees and
other
Americans.
We endorsed
and lobbied
for proposed
changes to
enhance
global
competition
and to
eliminate
what are
known to be
non-competitive
practices.
Proposals
were
actually
included in
the reform
bills but
did not
survive
prescription
drug and
insurance
industry
lobbyists
who spent
hundreds of
millions of
dollars to
defeat
progress.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer NRLN
Newsletter
Highlights
Importance
of
Grassroots
Network
You are
invited to
read the
NRLN FOCUS
Newsletter
Summer 2010
edition on
the NRLN
website at:
http://www.nrln.org/Newsletters/NRLN%20FOCUS%20SUMMER%202010%20V2%20.pdf
.
Attention is
given to the
need for
NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members to
take the
initiative
to
communicate
with their
members of
Congress. I
write in my
column that
it is your
willingness
to take
action as a
Grassroots
Network
member that
in large
measure
determines
how
successful
the NRLN can
be in
influencing
members of
Congress.
An
article asks
Grassroots
Network
members to
use a
special
webpage for
a
preliminary
show of
interest in
whether you
would
participate
in the
NRLN's
Washington,
DC Fly-In on
September 13
and 14 to
meet with
lawmakers
and staff
members on
Capitol
Hill.
Bob
Martina,
NRLN Vice
President -
Grassroots
Network,
announces in
his column
the
availability
of an
"Activity
Log" webpage
for
Grassroots
Network
members to
report their
personal
contacts
with U.S.
Representatives
and
Senators. I
urge you to
use this
page so we
can get a
better
handle on
how we are
interacting
with members
of Congress.
Seven NRLN/Retiree
Association
leaders give
their
personal
comments on
the
importance
of
communicating
with members
of Congress
on issues
critical to
retirees.
Read the
NRLN Board
Member
profile on
Judy
Stenberg to
learn why
she believe
the NRLN is
the best
channel to
have
retirees'
demands
heard in
Washington,
DC.
In
her column,
Marta Bascom,
NRLN
Executive
Director,
points out
that, as
retirees, it
is vitally
important to
keep
Congress'
attention
focused on
issues which
will have
the greatest
benefit for
older
Americans as
incumbents
and
challengers
campaign for
your vote in
the November
general
election.
I
urge you to
read the
8-page
newsletter
and share it
with your
friends who
are not
familiar
with the
NRLN. Email
the link to
them or
print out
copies and
give it to
them if they
don't have
Internet
access.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRLN
continues to
use its
whitepaper
written last
year to
advocate
with members
of Congress
and their
staffs the
need for
legislation
to reduce
the cost of
prescription
drugs. The
NRLN is
seeking
legislation
to
accomplish
the
following:
(1) Enable
re-importation
and
importation
of safe, FDA
approved
prescription
drugs;
(2) Enable
Medicare to
develop
formularies
and take
competitive
bids for
prescription
drugs;
(3) Staff
and fund the
FDA to
reduce the
generic drug
approval
backlog; (4)
Prevent drug
companies
from
colluding to
subvert free
market
practices.
We must
continue to
remind
Congress
that until
they demand
truly
competitive
markets
year-over-year
cost and
profit
increase
will not be
stopped.
The NRLN
recognizes
that many of
our
Grassroots
Network
members are
concerned
that
introducing
more
competition
into the
U.S.
pharmaceutical
industry
could
compromise
the quality
of
prescription
drugs for
American
consumers.
The fact is
that most
pharmaceutical
ingredients
used by
American
companies
are
currently
manufactured
overseas.
A January
20, 2009 New
York Times
article
revealed
that "the
critical
ingredients
for most
antibiotics
are now made
almost
exclusively
in China and
India." The
same is true
for other
crucial
medicines
used for
such things
as
diabetes and
high blood
pressure."
"Drug labels
often claim
that the
pills are
manufactured
in the
United
States, but
the listed
manufacturing
plants are
often the
sites where
foreign-made
drug powders
are pounded
into pills
and
packaged,"
according to
the New York
Times.
American
drug
manufacturers
are a part
of the
offshore
problem.
Ingredients
and pills
processed
offshore are
sold into
foreign
countries at
much lower
prices than
in the U.S.
This places
the American
consumer in
the position
of having to
pay
excessive
prices that
effectively
subsidize
foreign cost
of sales and
expenses.
A recent
study showed
that
American
pharmaceutical
companies
raised
prices on
their
brand-name
drugs by
9.3% and on
specialty
drugs by
10.3% during
the same
period that
the overall
consumer
price index
fell by
0.3%. The
NRLN
believes
these levels
of price
increases on
prescription
drugs are
unacceptable,
especially
when
retirees
must buy
their
medicines
with
limited,
fixed
incomes.
The NRLN
will
continue its
efforts to
gain
legislation
to introduce
more
competition
to break the
stranglehold
that drug
companies
have on
Americans.
Bill
Kadereit
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
|
|
|
 |
|
VERY URGENT
- NRLN
Action Alert
Tell
Lawmakers To
Help Secure
Your Pension
MY PREVIOUS
MESSAGE TO
YOU ASKED
THAT YOU
SEND A
CAPWIZ
MESSSAGE TO
YOUR HOUSE
OF
REPRESENTATIVES
MEMBER WHO
CAN HELP
SECURE YOUR
PENSION. SO
FAR, MANY OF
YOU HAVE
BEEN CONTENT
TO "LET
SOMEBODY
ELSE DO IT".
PLEASE HELP
BY TAKING
ACTION ON
BEHALF OF
YOURSELF AND
ALL OTHER
RETIREES.
IF YOU
DON'T, IT IS
POSSIBLE
THAT YOU MAY
REGRET IT
SOMEDAY.
THE CURRENT
STOCK MARKET
MELT DOWN
COMBINED
WITH THE
UNETHICAL
TAKING OF
ASSETS FROM
YOUR PENSION
PLAN MAY
BE PLACING
YOUR FUTURE
AT RISK AND
YOU WILL NOT
KNOW IT FOR
MONTHS.
LET'S STOP
COMPANIES
LIKE GM,
CHRYSLER,
ALCATEL-LUCENT,
QWEST, AT&T,
DETROIT
EDISON AND
OTHERS FROM
STEALING OUR
PENSION
SECURITY BY
DEMANDING
THAT H.R.
4213
INCLUDES
LANGUAGE
THAT WILL
PROTECT OUR
PENSIONS.
Click
http://capwiz.com/abtr/home/
to access
the NRLN
Action Alert
labeled ACT
NOW TO
PROTECT
PENSIONS.
Click the
"Take
Action"
button, type
in your zip
code and
click "GO"
to identify
your
Representative.
Click the
"Elected
Officials"
tab and
write down
his or her
phone number!
Now
personalize
the letter
with your
own comments
if you want
to. If you
have a
problem
accessing
the Action
Alert with
the above
link, go to
www.nrln.org
and click on
the "Take
Action Now"
at the top
of the NRLN
website's
home page.
SEND YOUR
MESSAGE (SEE
IT BELOW)
NOW......
ALSO CALL
HIM OR HER
OR TELL
ANYBODY THAT
ANSWERS,
THAT YOU
SENT A
MESSAGE AND
THAT YOU
EXPECT
ACTION NOT
POLITICAL
BS...SAY IT
LIKE YOU
MEAN
IT......MAKE
THAT CALL!!!
You can also
find your
Representative's
phone number
in the
Congressional
Directory on
the NRLN
website at:
http://capwiz.com/abtr/dbq/officials/
.
Nike says it
best ---
JUST DO IT!
---------------------------------------------------------
Sample
Letter:
Dear
Representative
____________:
I am writing
to ask that
you to keep
in H.R. 4213
the
provision
limiting the
ability of
companies
opting for
funding
relief to
use pension
plan assets
to make lump
sum
severance
payments. I
have heard
that General
Motors is
opposing
this
limitation.
GM,
Chrysler,
Alcatel-Lucent,
Delta and
other
companies
have proven
untrustworthy
to protect
the
interests of
employees
and retirees
by using
pension
assets for
non-pension
expenses. I
believe you
have a
public
policy
obligation
to me to
stop this!
GM reported
a $1.8
billion
shortfall as
of October
31, 2008, a
deficit that
had swollen
far larger
by February
2009. The
Detroit
Free Press
reported
that,
GM and
Chrysler
admitted
that, for
the first
time in
their
history,
they were
using
pension
assets to
fund lump
sum
severance
payments,
ranging from
$45,000 to
$62,500,
that would
be paid in
addition to
workers'
accrued
retirement
benefit.
Alcatel-Lucent
published in
its 2003
10-K that
they took $2
billion.
Delphi used
this "back
door
reversions"
practice and
it
contributed
to the
tragedy of
many Delphi
salaried
retirees and
placed the
Pension
Benefit
Guaranty
Corporation
at risk. The
PBGC took
over the
Delphi
salaried
pension
plan, at 55%
funded.
These lump
sum payments
are bribes
to induce
early
retirement
and are
business
expenses,
not pension
benefits. If
you don't
understand
the
concepts,
ask an
accountant,
FASB or the
CBO.
Last month
the
Government
Accountability
Office
reported
that GM will
need to add
$12.3
billion to
its pension
fund by 2014
and Chrysler
will need to
add $2.62
billion. If
those
contributions
aren't met,
is the
federal
government
going to
step in and
pay for the
pensions of
the 956,000
GM and
Chrysler
employees
and
retirees?
Does
Congress
want to
offer
funding
relief to
GM, Chrysler
and others
yet leave
the door
open for
them during
the funding
relief
period to
simultaneously
remove
assets from
the pension
plan for
corporate
restructuring
expenses?
You need to
take action
that is in
the best
interest of
the
constituents
in your
District who
voted to
send you to
Congress to
take care of
their
business. I
want to hear
from you
that you
will do
everything
possible to
include a
provision in
the House
bill to
protect
pension plan
assets for
the benefit
of retirees.
I want
action, not
rhetoric and
I need it
now. Please
do the right
thing!
Sincerely,
|
|
|
NRLN Presents
Legislative
Agenda to
White House
Staff
As the result
of a number of
NRLN letters
sent to the
White House,
President
Obama's staff
charged with
crafting and
managing
health care
reform policy
for the
Administration
invited the
NRLN
Washington, DC
team to a
one-on-one
meeting. Marta
Bascom, NRLN
Executive
Director, and
Michael
Calabrese,
NRLN
Legislative
Strategist,
met on
Thursday, Feb.
17th, with key
staff members
to reiterate
the NRLN's
primary health
care
legislative
priorities.
The NRLN staff
placed
emphasis on
the
reimportation
of safe, lower
cost
prescription
drugs; the
NRLN's
Maintenance of
Cost Payment
proposal to
protect
retirement
benefits as
currently
embodied in
the House
health care
reform bill,
and Medicare
buy-in for
retirees ages
55-64 at a
cost that will
not burden
Medicare, plus
other issues
important to
retirees.
The White
House staff
restated
President
Obama's
commitment to
comprehensive
health care
reform and
reviving the
conference on
the bills that
have been
passed by the
House and
Senate. The
NRLN urged the
White House to
support the
NRLN's efforts
on Capitol
Hill to get
these
proposals
passed
independently
should they
not pass in a
comprehensive
national
health care
bill. Many of
the issues of
great
importance to
retirees are
not included
in the final,
pared-down
bills on the
Hill and need
to be
addressed
immediately.
The fact that
the White
House invited
the NRLN's
staff to a
meeting
demonstrates
that our
messages are
gaining the
attention of
government
leaders. The
emails and
phone calls to
Washington, DC
from our
Grassroots
Network
members are an
important part
of making the
voices of
retirees
heard.
Together, our
efforts will
make a
positive
contribution
to retirement
security.
Finally, I
want to share
with you below
the text of a
letter that I
sent to
Senator Harry
Reid, Majority
Leader, with a
copy to House
Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, on the
subject of
pension asset
protection. A
similar
personalized
letter was
sent to six
other leaders
in the Senate.
We are closely
tracking the
pension
funding relief
issue in
Congress and
may need to
call on our
Grassroots
Network
members to
send letters
and make phone
calls to their
elected
representatives.
Bill Kadereit
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
--------------------------------------------------------------
February 14,
2010
The Honorable
Harry Reid,
Majority
Leader
United States
Senate
522 Hart
Senate Office
Building
Washington, DC
20510-2803
Dear Senator
Reid:
It is
understandable
that a number
of Senators
would be
sympathetic to
the appeals
from numerous
companies for
temporary
relief from
pension plan
funding
requirements
due to the
steep market
slide in 2008.
The National
Retiree
Legislative
Network (NRLN),
which
represents the
interests of
more than 2
million
retirees who
have retired
from 114
companies and
public
entities,
recognizes the
plight of
these
companies. We
would not want
to force
contributions
to pension
plans that
would cause
irreparable
harm to the
companies,
trigger
layoffs or
result in
companies
declaring
bankruptcy.
However,
pension plan
assets
currently held
in trust
should not be
allowed to be
used by these
same companies
to pay for
operating
expenses.
ERISA should
be amended to
stop companies
from using
pension assets
to make
severance
payments
during a
corporate
restructuring.
These "back
door
reversions"
represent a
widespread
practice by
companies to
circumvent the
Congressional
policy against
reverting
pension assets
for corporate
purposes. It
simply doesn't
make sense for
Congress to
authorize a
funding hiatus
without
simultaneously
closing this
back door.
To better
protect the
pensions of
retirees and
future
retirees, I
urge you to
include in the
Senate's
pension
funding relief
bill language
similar to the
provisions
that are in
Section 111
(pages 65 and
66) of H.R.
3936, the
Preserve
Benefits and
Jobs Act of
2009,
sponsored by
Representatives
Earl Pomeroy
and Pat Tiberi.
The language
in Section 111
relating to a
company's
ability to
amend its
pension plan,
in part,
states: "No ad
hoc amendment
to a defined
benefit plan
which is a
single
employer plan
which has the
effect of
increasing
liabilities of
the plan by
reason of
increases in
benefits,
establishment
of new
benefits,
changing the
rate of
benefit
accrual, or
changing the
rate of which
benefits
become
nonforfeitable
may take
effect during
the plan year
if the
adjusted
funding target
attainment
percentage for
such plan year
is- ''(I) less
than 120
percent, or
''(II) would
be less than
120 percent
taking into
account such
amendment."
An increasing
number of
companies have
tapped pension
assets to pay
for lump sum
payments equal
to six (6)
months or even
twelve (12)
months pay to
employees who
agree to
retire within
a specific
time window.
In 2001 and
2002, a
struggling
Lucent
Technologies
charged $2.2
billion in
lump sum
"termination
benefits" to
its various
employee
pension plans.
More recently,
GM used $2.9
billion in
pension assets
to make lump
sum severance
payments
during 2008 -
and ended the
year with a
$12.4 billion
pension
deficit ($20
billion by
PBGC
calculations).
AT&T,
Bethlehem
Steel,
Chrysler,
Consolidated
Freightways,
Delphi, Delta
Air Lines,
Federal
Express,
Polaroid,
Qwest, United
Airlines,
Verizon and
many other
corporate plan
sponsors have
raided pension
assets with
impunity and
used those
assets to
cover their
business
restructuring
expenses.
These back
door
reversions are
not offset by
corresponding
reductions to
pension
liabilities
and are gone
forever. This
practice
places pension
plans at risk
to be
terminated. It
is past time
to end this
pilfering of
defined plan
pension
assets. These
actions
threaten the
security of
pension plans
and the
potential is
great that the
Pension
Benefits
Guaranty Corp.
(PBGC) might
have to take
over the plan
in the future.
Furthermore,
depleted
assets reduce
the likelihood
the plan will
ever generate
surplus assets
that can be
used to offset
corporate
health care
costs for
retirees or be
available for
pension Cost
of Living
Adjustments
(COLAs), a
benefit that
non-government
retirees
seldom
receive.
The NRLN has
researched and
written a
whitepaper on
how companies
are misusing
pension plan
assets and
provides our
proposed
amendments to
the Pension
Protection Act
of 2006 to
prevent the
abuses. I have
attached the
Executive
Summary from
the
whitepaper. If
you would like
to receive a
copy of the
entire
whitepaper,
please contact
Marta Bascom,
the NRLN's
Executive
Director, on
(703) 863-9611
or by email at
marta.bascom@linkspace.net
.
The Senate has
an opportunity
for a quid pro
quo-companies
receive
temporary
funding relief
and retirees
gain the
protection of
their pension
assets from
being used for
non-pension
expenses.
Please don't
miss this
opportunity to
provide for
the financial
security of
America's
retirees. NRLN
members who
are Nevada
residents have
retired from
AT&T,
Alcatel-Lucent,
Chrysler,
Delta Air
Lines, General
Motors, Qwest
and NRLN
individual
members
retired from
many other
companies will
appreciate
your support
on this
matter.
Sincerely,
Signed
Bill Kadereit
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Attachment
Copy to:
Representative
Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker
U.S. House of
Representatives
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NRLN
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Back Door
Reversions:
Draining
Pension Assets
for Severance
and Other
Corporate
Purposes
Threatens
Retirement
Security
Executive
Summary
The use of
pension assets
to make
severance
payments
during a
corporate
restructuring
is the largest
and most
widespread
"back door
reversion" by
which some
companies are
seeking to
circumvent the
Congressional
policy against
reverting
pension assets
for corporate
purposes. When
pension funds
were used to
finance
hostile
takeovers and
the mass
layoffs that
typically
followed, in
1990 Congress
stopped the
practice by
imposing a 50
percent excise
tax on pension
reversions.
But today's
"back door
reversions"
are more
insidious.
Although ERISA
explicitly
prohibits the
use of
qualified
pension assets
for "layoff
benefits,"
companies can
amend a plan
at any time
not merely to
offer older
workers
enhanced early
retirement
benefits (by
awarding extra
years of
service
credit), but
even to offer
lump sum
severance
payments equal
to a year's
salary or more
as part of a
corporate
restructuring.
The 2006
Pension
Protection Act
tightened up
on this
practice
somewhat by
requiring plan
sponsors to
pre-fund a
plan amendment
that increases
benefit
liabilities to
the extent the
plan's funding
level would
fall below 80
percent (after
taking account
of the new
benefit
liability).
However, as
the 2008 stock
market
meltdown
demonstrated,
a plan that is
only 80
percent funded
during a bull
market could
easily end up
below 60
percent funded
in a bear
market - and
in default
with the PBGC
if the plan
sponsor
declares
bankruptcy.
Moreover, any
significant
reduction
below full
funding not
only leaves
all plan
participants
insecure, it
also reduces
the ability of
the plan to
build a
surplus that
could be used
to grant
cost-of-living
adjustments to
longtime
retirees,
whose fixed
monthly
benefits erode
with
inflation, or
to offset the
cost of
retiree health
benefits
through a
Section 420
transfer.
The trend
toward
distressed
companies
using employee
pension assets
to pay
severance
costs -
instead of
relying on a
restructuring
reserve or
other
corporate
assets - is
not new to the
current
financial
crisis.
Lucent, United
Airlines,
AT&T, Verizon,
Qwest, Federal
Express, Delta
and Delphi are
among the
other
companies that
have tapped
pension assets
to pay
corporate
restructuring
costs. Some of
these
companies
drained
pension assets
for severance
payments as
they spiraled
downhill
toward
bankruptcy and
an eventual
taxpayer
bailout
courtesy of
the PBGC.
Other
companies,
left
under-funded,
cut other
retiree
benefits
across the
board. And
some others,
although their
plans remained
solvent, used
up "surplus"
assets that
could have
benefitted the
vast majority
of plan
participants
if used
instead for
cost-of-living
adjustments or
offset the
cost of
retiree health
care benefits.
In the current
crisis,
General Motors
used pension
assets to pay
for billions
in severance
payments
during 2008 -
and ended up
with such a
dangerous
degree of
under-funding
that in early
2009 the
Treasury
Department
restricted the
practice as a
condition of
the federal
bailout loan
package.
The most
effective way
for Congress
to protect
plan
participants
(and
taxpayers)
from unfunded
liabilities
from
severance,
layoff or any
other benefit
increase is
simply to
increase the
target funding
level
threshold
required for
unfunded
benefit
increases and
lump sum
payouts from
the 80 percent
level,
currently
required under
the PPA, to
120 percent.
Severance or
other benefit
increases to
selected
individuals
that are not
funded should
be paid out of
the company's
operating
expenses, not
from the
pension trust.
This would not
limit the
ability of
plan sponsors
to enhance
benefits. What
it does do is
require
companies to
currently fund
lump sum
payouts or
other benefit
increases that
would
otherwise
cause the plan
to become
under-funded
or worsen its
level of
under-funding.
Amendments
increasing
benefits that
are
collectively
bargained or
negotiated
between a plan
sponsor and
bona fide
union
representatives,
or in the
context of a
jointly-trusteed
Taft-Hartley
plan, should
be exempted
from this more
restrictive
funding level.
================================================
NRLN Challenge
in 2010 -
Protect Social
Security and
Medicare
After the dust
settles on the
national
health care
debate, we
will be
challenged to
lobby harder
than ever to
protect Social
Security and
Medicare
benefits.
Congress never
intended to
address
Medicare
benefits in a
meaningful way
in health care
reform
legislation.
But the
President and
some members
of Congress
have announced
that 2010 will
be the year
when they form
task forces
and committees
to address
Medicare and
Social
Security.
We are making
progress on
pension asset
protection
legislation
and hope to
wage a strong
campaign to
protect
existing
health care
benefits and
not just
maintain
Medicare
benefits but
to get
catastrophic
coverage
(out-if-pocket
limits) added
to Medicare. A
summary
version of the
Top Priorities
and the rest
of our 2010
Legislative
Agenda are
shown below.
The NRLN board
and retiree
association
leaders from
across the
country met in
Washington D.C,
last week, to
set the NRLN
2010
Legislative
Agenda for
lobbying to
protect your
income and
health care
related
benefits. They
approved our
budget and
lobbying plans
and met with
guest speakers
from Capitol
Hill and
federal
agencies to
discuss what
can and must
be done to
maintain and
advance
retiree
benefits.
Topics ranged
from pension
security to
bankruptcy and
Medicare.
Executives
from the
Pension
Benefit
Guarantee
Corporation (PBGC),
the Department
of Labor, and
Congressional
committees
spoke and
responded to
questions.
Perhaps the
best part of
our NRLN
Annual
Leadership
Conference was
when conferees
walked to
appointments
on the Hill to
tell their
members of
Congress about
our
Legislative
Agenda and
what they want
Congress to do
about it. NRLN
members made
appointments
and met with
forty-six
different
members if
Congress and
their staffs
on January 13.
Leaders from
the GM,
Chrysler,
Kodak, and
Lucent
Technologies
retiree
associations
met with House
and Senate
Judiciary
staffs and
legal counsel
and hope to
get a hearing
scheduled to
air the need
for corporate
bankruptcy law
reform. The
Delta Pilots,
Chrysler and
Alcatel Lucent
members met
with
Congressional
leaders on
PBGC rules
reform and
grilled our
PBGC speakers.
Lucent, Qwest,
Detroit
Edison, and
AT&T retiree
attendees met
on pension
security and
prescription
drug
legislation.
We all
expressed
concern over
the future of
Medicare,
Social
Security and
other issues
specific to
our retiree
associations.
Prospective
NRLN members,
association
leaders from
John Deere and
Raytheon met
with seven (7)
different
members of
Congress. We
will highlight
details of the
entire
conference in
our first 2010
issue of the
FOCUS
Newsletter.
Soon we will
invite you and
others to
another Fly-In
lobby day that
will take
place probably
in September.
Be sure to
express
appreciation
to your
retiree
association
presidents and
others from
your
associations
who attended
last week and
do your part
by
contributing
time and money
to the NRLN-affiliated
retiree
associations
and the NRLN
if you can.
They are very
serious on
your behalf
and unlike
other larger
U.S.
organizations
that claim to
be friends of
the retiree,
they actually
work hard to
support just
you. They
don't have to
be doing this,
please support
them.
Most of all,
sign up your
friends and
neighbors,
send us email
distribution
lists and work
hard to help
us grow a
strong
grassroots
network in
your hometown.
Tip O'Neil, a
deceased
Speaker of the
House once
said "all
politics is
local". That
is so true,
meet with your
hometown
members of
Congress and
ask them what
they are doing
to support
your retiree
agenda.
Bill Kadereit
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
NRLN
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
NRLN
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Summary of
NRLN 2010
Legislative
Agenda
(Full NRLN
2010
Legislative
Agenda is
available at
www.nrln.org)
2010
TOP
INITIATIVES
PENSION
ASSET
PROTECTION
(PAP): The
NRLN advocates
legislation
that stops
corporations
from taking
pension assets
from defined
pension plan
trusts to pay
for lump sum
severance and
early
retirement
incentives.
The NRLN
advocates that
pension funds
not be used to
pay executive
non-qualified
pensions and
other deferred
compensation.
The NRLN
advocates that
pension plan
assets should
not be
transferred to
or be taken
over by third
party
financial or
other
institutions.
PBGC
REFORM:
The NRLN
advocates that
the Pension
Benefits
Guaranty
Corporation
must be
regulated to
ensure
equitable
calculations
of benefit
payments
earned by
retirees.
BANKRUPTCY
REFORM:
The NRLN
advocates that
bankruptcy
reform is
needed to
place
retirees'
pensions and
benefits on a
list of
obligations
that companies
can't shed.
Retirees often
lose pension,
health care,
and other
benefits and,
unlike secured
creditors,
rarely have
the ability to
recover
losses.
PROTECTION
AND
ENHANCEMENT OF
RETIREE HEALTH
CARE BENEFITS:
MAINTENANCE OF
COST PAYMENT:
The NRLN
advocates a
Maintenance of
Cost Payment (MCP)
proposal that
would
establish a
fixed monthly
payment to
retirees
equivalent to
the value an
employer
provided prior
to the
reduction or
cancellation
of retirement
health care,
prescription
drugs, life
insurance,
long-term care
or other
benefits.
Companies
would be
entitled to
tax credits as
an offset to
MCP payments.
MEDICARE
BUY-IN FOR
AGES 55-64:
The NRLN
advocates that
adults age 55
to 64 be
allowed to buy
Medicare
coverage at a
cost that does
not burden the
Medicare
system. Access
could be
limited to
individuals
without access
to an
employer-sponsored
or other group
health plan
that is
actuarially
equivalent or
superior to
Medicare.
INCLUSION
OF
CATASTROPHIC
COVERAGE IN
MEDICARE:
The NRLN
advocates that
Congress
should extend
protection
against
catastrophic
medical costs
to the
Medicare
population by
setting a
reasonable
maximum limit
on
out-of-pocket
costs.
PROTECT
RETIREES IN
MERGERS &
ACQUISITIONS:
The NRLN
advocates law
that clarifies
what a parent
foreign
owner's
pension plan
obligations
are to abide
by ERISA
should its
U.S.
subsidiary be
spun off or
dissolved.
Clarification
must include
situations
where foreign
corporations
that own U.S.
subsidiaries
are also
acquired by a
third party,
foreign-owned
corporation.
REDUCE THE
COST OF
PRESCRIPTION
DRUGS: The
NRLN advocates
the reduction
of
prescription
drug costs for
Americans
through
passage of
legislation
that: (1)
Enables
re-importation
and
importation of
safe
prescription
drugs approved
by the FDA;
(2) Enables
Medicare to
develop
formularies
and take
competitive
bids for
prescription
drugs; (3)
Staffs and
funds the FDA
to reduce the
generic drug
approval
backlog; (4)
Prevents drug
companies from
colluding to
control
pricing or
subvert free
market
practices.
PROTECT
MEDICARE:
The NRLN
advocates that
Congress must
guard against
reductions in
Medicare
expenditures
that
negatively
impact the
care that
retirees
receive from
doctors,
hospitals and
other health
care services.
PROTECT
SOCIAL
SECURITY:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation to
make Social
Security
financially
sound without
reducing
current and
future retiree
benefits.
THE
REMAINDER OF
THE 2010 NRLN
LEGISLATIVE
AGENDA
Cash
Balance Plans:
The NRLN
advocates the
elimination of
"wear-away"
rules
contained in
cash-balance
plans.
EEOC Rule:
The NRLN
advocates
elimination of
the EEOC final
ruling issued
on December
26, 2007,
allowing
employers to
cancel earned
health care
benefits of
Medicare
eligible
retirees.
Company
Benefits
Bundling:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation to
prohibit
companies from
forcing
retirees to
choose between
company
pre-determined
bundles of
plans or none
of their
sponsored
Health Care
and
Prescription
Drug Plans.
Bundling
practices hold
retirees
hostage to
such plans.
Encourage
Retention Of
Company-Provided
Health Care
For Retirees:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation
that would
increase the
Medicare Part
D prescription
plan subsidy
paid to
employers who
offer better
coverage than
required for
equivalent
coverage in
Part D, if
they agree to
maintain their
current plans.
Taxing
Health Care
Benefits:
The NRLN
advocates that
the portion of
premiums paid
by employers
that is
currently
treated as a
tax-free
benefit to
employees and
retirees
should remain
tax free.
Deductibility
Of Health Care
Costs: The
NRLN advocates
new
legislation
that enables
health care
and Medicare
premiums to be
tax
deductible,
similar to the
way health
insurance
premiums for
the
self-employed
are
deductible.
Such
deductions
would be
exempt from
the 7.5% (AGI)
limitation.
Health
Savings
Accounts (HSA's):
The NRLN
advocates
changing the
IRS Code of
1986 to allow
HSA funding
directly from
IRAs for all
years, not one
year, without
tax penalties
and limits on
annual
contributions.
Withdrawals
To Pay Retiree
Health
Premiums:
The NRLN
advocates laws
that enable
penalty- free
withdrawals
from 401k,
IRA, SEP and
other
qualified
accounts to
pay retiree
health care
premiums.
Alternate
Minimum Tax:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation
that raises
the
Alternative
Minimum Tax
threshold
level and also
the annual
inflation
indexing of
the threshold.
Taxing
Social
Security
Income:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation to
amend the tax
codes to
eliminate
federal and
state taxes on
all Social
Security
income and/or
allow a tax
credit for
taxes
withheld.
401-k / IRA
Mandatory
Distribution
Requirement
From 70 ½ to
age 75:
The NRLN
advocates
legislation
that will
allow
individual
choice to
defer Required
Mandatory
Distribution (RMD)
from
retirement
savings
accounts.
|
| |
|
The LRO
Newsletter:
If for some
reason the
link below to
the LRO
Newsletter
shouldn't work
or go bad you
can click on
the link here
to be able to
open the file.
(Click
Here)
If you don't
have the
lastest Adobe
Reader you
will also need
it to view the
file and you
can get it
here.
Just click on
the link
http://get.adobe.com/reader/
|
| |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lucent
Retirees
Organization
Newsletter
SPECIAL NOTICE
November 2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
2009 LRO FALL
NEWSLETTER
AVAILAILABLE
ON WEBSITE.
This is a
special
newsletter! It
arrives and is
available at
the same time
as your
Alcatel-Lucent
(ALU) Open
Enrollment
Package. In
this
newsletter we
discuss your
Open
Enrollment and
Healthcare
benefits in
much more
detail. Also
included in
the
newsletter are
the results of
LROs meeting
with ALU
Officers,
Regional News
and much more.
The 2009 Fall
Newsletter is
now available
for you to
read on the
LRO website
at:http://
www.lucentretirees.com/docs/Newsletter2009-FALL.pdf
The LRO hopes
you will find
the new format
of the
newsletter
attractive and
easy to read.
You will need
Adobe Reader
software to be
able to open
the
newsletter. If
you do not
have Adobe
Reader
software,
please
go to the
following link
and download
the latest
version of the
FREE Adobe
Reader:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
If the link
above to the
LRO website
does not
provide you
access to the
newsletter,
you may go to
the LRO Home
Page/Latest
News at:
http://www.lucentretirees.com
and click on
the link in
the item about
the
newsletter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Join Our
Mailing List
[http://visitor.constantcontact.com/email.jsp?m=1102226108370]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Privacy
Policy:
http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp
Email
Marketing by
Constant
Contact(R)
www.constantcontact.com
Lucent
Retirees
Organization |
PO Box 412 |
Chatham | NJ |
07928
|
| |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lucent
Retirees
Organization
Newsletter
Alcatel-Lucent
Confirms
Annual Open
Enrollment
Period
October 17,
2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent
Confirms
Annual Open
Enrollment
Period for the
2010 Health
and Welfare
Benefits
Coverage
October 15,
2009
In a recent
mailing to
management
retirees,
Alcatel-Lucent
(ALU)
confirmed that
the annual
open
enrollment
period for the
2010
Alcatel-Lucent
health and
welfare
benefits
starts
November 9,
2009 at 8:00am
Eastern
Standard Time
(EST) and ends
on November
20, 2009 at
6:00pm EST.
Late
enrollments
will not be
allowed so you
must take
action before
6:00pm EST on
the last day
of open
enrollment.
For open
enrollment you
will need your
password to
access your
personalized
benefits
information
and/or enroll.
If you want to
check out your
password to
see that it is
active, go to
your Benefits
Resources
website at:
http://resources.hewitt.com/alcatel-lucent
and Select
"Log On" -
then enter
your social
security
number and
password.
If you
misplaced or
can't remember
your password,
you should
request a new
one now. It
can take up to
ten days to
receive a new
password in
the mail. You
can request a
new password
by going to
your Benefits
Resources
website at:
http://resources.hewitt.com/alcatel-lucent.
Select "Log
On"; then
enter your
social
security
number, then
select "I
Forgot My
Password." If
you have a
preferred
email address
on file you
can request to
have the new
password sent
to you
electronically,
or, you can
request to
have it mailed
to you. Note
that it can
take up to ten
days to
receive the
new password
in the mail.
For those that
don't have
internet
access, you
can call the
Alcatel-Lucent
Benefits
Center at
1-888-232-4111
to request a
new password.
Follow the
prompts to
enter your
social
security
number. Then
press "99"
followed by
the # key. At
the next menu,
press "2", and
then press
"1"; you can
then hang up -
your request
is complete
and your new
password will
be sent to
you.
Alcatel-Lucent
will mail a
bright yellow
envelope
containing
your
enrollment
materials to
you. It should
arrive in
early
November. This
package will
contain both
personalized
and
non-personalized
information
about your
2010 benefits
and how to
enroll.
Alcatel-Lucent
reports that
Benefit
Representatives
will not have
information
about your
2010 benefits
prior to the
open
enrollment
date of
November 9;
therefore,
they have
requested that
you do not
call the
Alcatel-Lucent
Benefits
Center with
questions
about your
2010 benefit
options or
pricing prior
to November 9.
If you want to
review
non-personalized
enrollment
information
prior to
receiving it
in the mail
you can log on
to the
BenefitAnswers
Plus website
at
www.benefitanswersplus.com,
starting the
week of
October 19,
2009.
Alcatel-Lucent
has announced
that the
SecureHorizons
"MedicareDirect"
PFFS Retiree
Plan will
again be
offered as a
medical plan
option for
2010. In late
October,
SecureHorizons
will mail
coverage
information to
those of you
that are
currently
enrolled in
this plan or
will become
Medicare
eligible by
December 31st.
For those who
have opted out
of this plan
but now may be
interested in
enrolling for
2010, watch
for details in
the mail on
how to request
a plan
information
package.
ALU will also
be offering
the Medco Rx
Plan for 2010
to those who
are on their
health care
plan. As in
2009, you will
have to be on
both their
health care
and
prescription
drug plans, or
you will not
be eligible to
either plan.
Should you
need
additional
assistance
during the
open
enrollment
process, the
Lucent
Retirees
Organization (LRO)
encourages you
to visit the
LRO Benefits
website at
www.lucentretirees.com
and click on
the Benefits
tab.
Additional
information
and resources
will be
available to
help you
through the
2010 benefits
open
enrollment
process. This
site will be
updated on a
continuous
basis as more
timely
information
becomes
available.
LRO Benefits
Team
Email
Marketing by
Lucent
Retirees
Organization |
PO Box 412 |
Chatham | NJ |
0 |
| |
| |
|
|
NRLN
Advocates
Revisions
to House
Healthcare
Bill
Amendments
You may
recall that
in my July
15th
message to
NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members, I
reported
that in the
U.S. House
TriCommittees'
healthcare
reform bill
released on
July 14th
there were
elements of
the NRLN's
Maintenance
of Cost
Payment (MCP)
proposal to
protect
retiree
benefits.
During the
days prior
to the
House's
August
Recess, the
TriCommittees'
bill went
through
what is
known as
the
"markup"
process and
two
"Manager's
Amendments"
were added
to the
bill.
These
amendments
are in
Sections
164 and 165
of H.R.
3200,
America's
Affordable
Health
Choices Act
of 2009.
While these
Sections
reflect our
MCP
proposal
and what we
had asked
Congress to
do, we have
been
studying
these
Sections
and our
Washington,
DC staff
has been
discussing
the
language
with
influential
members of
House
committees
and staff
members of
those
committees.
The NRLN
has
concluded
that
certain
aspects of
both
Sections
need to be
changed to
provide the
most
protection
to
retirees'
healthcare
benefits.
First, I'll
address
Section 165
which if
enacted
would amend
the
Employee
Retirement
Income
Security
Act of 1974
(ERISA) to
expressly
bar
employer-sponsored
healthcare
plans from
reducing
medical,
surgical,
hospital
and
prescription
drug
benefits
for
retirees
and
beneficiaries
after an
individual
retires.
This is
similar to
the
objective
of our MCP
and would
be very
beneficial
to retirees
and their
beneficiaries.
In essence,
it would
provide
ERISA
protection
to
retirement
healthcare
benefits
similar to
the
protection
granted
under ERISA
to pension
plans.
After
stating
that
retirees'
benefits
are barred
from being
reduced,
language
was
unfortunately
added
stating,
"unless
such
reduction
is also
made with
respect to
active
participants."
The NRLN
opposes
this
exception.
It would
provide an
incentive
to
employers
to reduce
retirees'
healthcare
benefits by
also
reducing
the
benefits of
active
employees
or by
reducing
existing
retiree
benefits to
a lower
level that
matched
benefits of
active
employees.
We know of
a number of
cases where
the active
employees'
health care
benefits
have
already
been
eliminated
but
retirees
still have
some
benefits.
In
addition to
advocating
that this
exception
be removed,
the NRLN is
asking the
TriCommittees'
leaders to
make the
Section 165
ERISA
protection
effective
12-31-2008.
Many NRLN
members
experienced
significant
changes in
their
healthcare
benefits on
1-1-2009.
As you may
recall, our
MCP
included a
proposal to
provide
incentives
for
employers
to maintain
healthcare
benefits
for all
retirees.
While there
is not a
tax credit
incentive
currently
in Sections
164 and 165
as the MCP
proposed,
Section 164
would
establish a
"reinsurance
program" to
provide
reimbursement
to
employers
for much of
the cost of
providing
health
benefits to
retirees
age 55 or
older, but
not
Medicare
eligible,
and to
eligible
spouses,
surviving
spouses and
dependents
of
retirees. A
federal
trust fund
would
reimburse
employers
for 80% of
the claim
cost that
exceeds
$15,000 but
is less
than
$90,000.
The NRLN
supports
this
incentive
but
requests
Section 164
be changed
to include
all
retirees,
including
Medicare-eligible
retirees.
Our
Washington,
DC staff
believes
that the
NRLN needs
to generate
a
considerable
amount of
retiree
support for
Sections
164 and
165, along
with the
changes we
deem
necessary,
to keep
these
amendments
in H.R.
3200 when
the House
takes up
the bill
again after
Labor Day.
Following
this
message is
the latest
draft of
the NRLN's
"Talking
Points"
that
includes
what we
want to
happen with
healthcare
reform plus
pension
asset
protection,
bankruptcy
reform and
PBGC rule
changes.
Please
print out
these
"Talking
Points" to
use and
leave with
your
Senators
and
Representative
when you
meet with
them during
the August
Recess
whether
during
personal
appointments
or town
hall
meetings.
The NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members who
will be
going to
Washington,
DC on
September
15-17 for
meetings on
Capitol
Hill are
encouraged
to begin
their
"homework"
with these
"Talking
Points."
If
situations
change
during the
coming
weeks, we
will update
the
"Talking
Points" as
necessary.
Soon, I
will be
sending
letters to
the leaders
of the
TriCommittees
to urge
them to
keep
Sections
164 and 165
in the
bill, but
make the
changes
that the
NRLN
believes
are crucial
to
protecting
retirees'
healthcare
benefits.
In
addition, I
will be
asking the
Grassroots
Network
members who
are
constituents
of the
TriCommittees'
leaders to
respond to
an NRLN
Action
Alert and
send the
emails
advocating
the NRLN's
position on
the
amendments.
After two
years of
lobbying
for the MCP
(read the
NRLN
Legislative
Agenda at
www.nrln.org),
the
concepts
are in the
House bill,
but fine
tuning is
necessary.
Now that we
are this
close we
must work
together to
keep the
concepts in
the House
bill. The
Senate bill
that is
still being
drafted
does not
currently
contain
these
provisions
for
retirees.
Bill
Kadereit,
President
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Legislative
Agenda
Priorities
PENSION
ASSET
PROTECTION,
BANKRUPTCY
and PBGC
RULES
REFORM
Protection
of Defined
Pension
Plan Assets:
- The
NRLN's
proposed
refinements
to the
Pension
Protection
Act of 2006
are vital
to the
continued
protection
of plan
assets and
PBGC
viability,
and to the
generation
of surplus
assets that
can be used
to offset
corporate
healthcare
costs or be
available
for Cost of
Living
Adjustments
(COLA's).
Pension
plan assets
must:
-
Not be
used to
pay for
corporate
restructuring
lump sum
severance
allowances
or
buyouts.
-
Not be
used to
pay for
executive
management
non-qualified
pensions
or other
deferred
compensation.
-
Not be at
risk to be
sold by
plan
sponsors
or the
PBGC to
third
party
financial
or other
institutions.
Pension
Funding
Rules
- Increase
the maximum
asset
funding
contribution
level from
100% to
120% so
companies
can
over-fund
plans when
cash flow
permits.
Bankruptcy
Reform
-
-
Require
that
companies
must
provide
retirees
with an
updated
list of
all
retirees
and that
it must be
updated
throughout
Chapter 11
proceedings.
-
Mandate
Section
1114
Committees
within 60
days of
Chapter 11
filing
date.
-
Permanently
increase
the Health
Coverage
Tax Credit
(HCTC)
payment
from 65%
to 80%
(post
stimulus).
-
Disallow
company
Reservation
Of Rights
(ROR)
clauses as
reason for
denying
retiree's
rights to
a Section
1114
Committee.
-
Require
pension
plan
sponsors
to fund
underfunded
plans
after
passage of
365 days
from date
of filing
for
Chapter 11
protection.
PBGC Rules
Reform
-
-
Proposed
Bill - The
Pension
Benefit
Guarantee
Corporation
shall use
the
Defined
Benefit
Plan
income and
pension
benefit
limitations
defined in
IRS codes
401(a) and
415(b) in
effect on
the date
of the
plan
termination
when
calculating
the
pension
benefits
payable
under
Priority
Category
Three
(PC3). In
addition,
the
retiree's
actual age
and length
of service
at
retirement
will be
used when
calculating
benefits
protected
under
Priority
Category
PC3. These
changes
shall be
retroactive
and apply
to all
defined
benefit
plans
terminated
after Sept
11, 2001.
-
PBGC
termination
valuation
- PBGC
rules used
to
determine
the
termination
values of
plans and
all other
PBGC rules
and
guidelines
should be
fully
disclosed
and made a
part of
the
Pension
Protection
Act (PPA)
of 2006.
Go to
www.nrln.org
and click
on the link
to read the
NRLN's
complete
Legislative
Agenda.
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Legislative
Agenda
Priorities
HEALTHCARE
INCLUDING
PRESCRIPTION
DRUGS
-
The House
TriCommittee
bill H.R.
3200
incorporates
MCP
concepts:
H.R. 3200,
Section
165 -
Prohibition
Against
Post-Retirement
Reductions
of Retiree
Health
Benefits -
bars
the
reduction
of retiree
benefits
post-retirement
and
prohibits
reservation
of rights
clauses as
a plan
sponsor
defense,
"unless
such
reduction
is also
made with
respect to
active
participants".
The NRLN
opposes
the quoted
exception
and also
requests a
revision
such that
Section
165
protection
becomes
effective
12-31-2008.
-
H.R. 3200,
Section
164 -
Reinsurance
Program
for
Retirees -
creates a
temporary
reinsurance
program
for
retirees
age 55 or
older but
not
Medicare
eligible.
Companies
would be
reimbursed
for the
cost of
benefits
paid to
retirees
or
eligible
dependents
and
for plan
deductibles,
co-payments
and
co-insurance.
Plans
would be
reimbursed
for 80% of
the claim
cost that
exceeds
$15,000
but is
less than
$90,000.
The NRLN
supports
this
incentive
only if
Section
164 is
amended to
include
Medicare-eligible
retirees.
-
Pass
legislation
that
enables
importation
of
prescription
drugs,
competitive
bidding
of
Medicare-D
prescription
drugs;
funding
the FDA to
reduce
generic
drug
backlogs;
stopping
brand drug
makers
from
paying
generic
drug
manufacturers
to
withhold
generic
drugs off
the
market.
-
Use
savings
from the
four
initiatives
above to
pay for
the
elimination
of the
"doughnut
hole"
in the
Medicare
Part D
prescription
drug plan
and to pay
for a
Medicare
catastrophic
benefit
and a
large
amount if
national
healthcare.
-
When an
employer
eliminates
its
healthcare
plan,
retirees
usually
lose
"catastrophic
coverage"
which
limits
out-
of-pocket
medical
expenses
to a fixed
amount,
such as
$1,500.
Given this
loss, the
NRLN
believes
that
catastrophic
coverage
should be
added to
Medicare.
-
It is
difficult
for many
men and
women age
50 to 64
who have
been laid
off or
retired
early-either
forced or
voluntary-to
purchase
affordable
healthcare
insurance
because of
their age.
They
should be
allowed to
buy
into
Medicare
at a cost
that
does not
burden the
system.
Healthcare
Taxation:
-
Don't tax
employer
benefits
or
premiums
and leave
the AGI
threshold
7.5%.
Go to
www.nrln.org
and click
on the link
to read the
NRLN's
complete
Legislative
Agenda. To
read the
NRLN
testimony
by Bill
Kadereit on
healthcare
for
retirees
before the
House
Education &
Labor
Committee
in
September
2008, go to
http://www.nrln.org/NRLN%202008%20Action%20%20Accomplishments%20Handouts.pdf
|
|
|
|
If you no
longer wish
to receive
e-mail from
us, please
click
here.
 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRLN Bulletin
U.S. House
TriCommittee's
Bill Includes
Proposals NRLN
Advocated
After three
years of the
NRLN and its
Grassroots
Network
members
lobbying
Congress on
our
Maintenance of
Cost Payment (MCP)
proposal to
protect
retiree
benefits, we
have learned
that a U.S.
House
TriCommittee's
health care
reform bill
released on
Tuesday, July
14, contains
elements of
what we have
been
proposing. In
dealing with
Congress it is
rare that one
gets in a bill
all of what is
being sought
and this bill
is no
exception.
However, we
consider it an
important
accomplishment
that the three
House
Committees
that the NRLN
has been
lobbying have
included three
provisions
that have been
central to the
health care
initiatives in
the NRLN's
Legislative
Agenda. These
include:
-
A $10 billion
reinsurance
program for
retirees
under which
former
employers
that continue
to provide
and pay for
insurance
coverage for
pre-Medicare-eligible
retirees age
55 to 65 can
be reimbursed
for 80
percent of
the cost of
claims
between
$15,000 to
$90,000.
In addition,
the House bill
should
generally
lower health
insurance
costs for
older workers
and retirees
by instituting
insurance
regulations
that guarantee
coverage,
prohibit
exclusions for
pre-existing
conditions,
and put a
fairly strict
limit on the
ability of
insurers to
charge higher
premiums based
on age.
The NRLN has
lobbied in
both the House
and Senate for
an MCP-type
solution. The
Senate Health,
Education,
Labor and
Pension (HELP)
Committee's
health care
bill has a
high-claim
reimbursement
provision
nearly
identical to
the one in the
House bill.
Both
provisions
would be
funded
initially at
$10 billion,
but would be
temporary and
phase out as
employers
purchase
coverage for
retirees
through the
exchanges.
NRLN will
advocate that
this retiree
reinsurance
subsidy for
employers be
made
permanent.
The NRLN also
continues to
advocate for
higher subsidy
levels for
pre-65
individuals
who have
retired
early-either
voluntarily or
forced-and the
more rapid
elimination of
the "doughnut
hole."
Last
September, I
testified
before the
House
Education and
Labor
Committee and
recommended
the MCP. In
addition, I
requested that
retirees ages
50 - 65 be
allowed to buy
into Medicare
on a cost
basis. While
the House and
Senate
Committees did
not propose
allowing
pre-65
retirees to
buy into
Medicare
directly, we
are pleased
that the
Committee
members
recognized the
need to
provide an
incentive to
employers to
continue
coverage since
it is
difficult and
often
cost-prohibitive
for men and
women in this
age group to
purchase
health care
insurance.
The House
Tri-Committee
bill also
includes a
public plan
option that is
functionally
the same as a
Medicare
buy-in at
cost, since it
would
reimburse
using Medicare
rates and will
use all
doctors and
hospitals
currently
accepting
Medicare
patients,
unless they
affirmatively
opt out. Since
2006, the
first year of
operation for
Medicare Part
D, the NRLN
knew that the
out-of-pocket
cost for
prescription
drugs once the
"doughnut
hole" was
reached would
be a financial
burden for
many retirees
and we have
lobbied to
eliminate it.
A great deal
of credit goes
to the NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members who
have sent
thousands of
emails and
talked with
Senators and
Representatives
to advocate
support for
the NRLN's
health care
agenda. Your
NRLN Executive
Director Marta
Bascom and our
Legislative
Strategist
Michael
Calabrese have
both worked
very hard on
the Hill with
Congressional
staffs,
telling our
story and
advocating our
proposals.
We will need
to continue
our lobbying
efforts to
have the
provisions
beneficial to
retirees in
whatever
additional
bills that
eventually are
drafted in the
Senate and the
bills that are
ultimately
voted on in
both
chambers. Our
Washington
team will
continue to be
engaged daily
with
Congressional
staff members
who are
working on
health care
proposals.
We will let
you know when
the time is
right and what
message we'd
like for you
to once again
communicate to
your elected
representatives
in an email, a
phone call to
their office
and in talking
with them when
they are back
home during
the
Congressional
Summer Recess
in August.
Until that
time, please
send your
members of
Congress the
NRLN's sample
letter that
can be
accessed
through the
NRLN's Action
Alert at:
http://capwiz.com/abtr/home/
. Look for the
Action Alert
headline:
CONGRESS MUST
HEAR THE
HEALTH CARE
NEEDS OF 50
MILLION
AMERICAN
RETIREES.
It is my
opinion that
there is no
such thing as
telling your
elected
representatives
too often what
you want
included in
health care
reform
legislation
and what you
want them to
oppose.
Because
leaders in the
U.S. Senate
are now saying
they will not
vote on a bill
until after
they return to
Washington
following the
Summer Recess
(Aug. 10 -
Sept. 7), it
appears likely
that the NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members who
come to
Washington on
Sept. 15 - 17
will have an
opportunity to
lobby health
care issues on
Capitol Hill
along with our
pension
protection and
bankruptcy
reform
initiatives.
It is not too
late for you
to decide to
join us in
Washington.
Details about
this event are
available in a
video clip and
an invitation
posted on the
NRLN website
home page at
www.nrln.org
.
Bill Kadereit,
President
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRLN's Letter
Sent To
President
Obama On
Prescription
Drugs
Below is the
text of a
letter that
NRLN President
Bill Kadereit
has faxed to
President
Obama.
Letters on
this
prescription
drugs issue
were also
faxed to Rahm
Emanuel, White
House
Chief-of-Staff;
Kathleen
Sebelius,
Secretary of
Health and
Human
Services;
Senator Byron
Dorgan and
Senator
Olympia Snowe,
who introduced
the
"Pharmaceutical
Market Access
and Drug
Safety Act",
and
Representative
Henry Waxman,
Chairman of
the House
Energy and
Commerce
Committee, who
is one of the
architects of
the health
care reform
legislation
being drafted
in the U.S.
House of
Representatives.
Ed Beltram,
Vice President
-
Communications
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
----------------------------------------------
(Faxed on NRLN
Letterhead)
July 13, 2009
President
Barack Obama
The White
House
1600
Pennsylvania
Avenue NW
Washington, DC
20500
Dear President
Obama:
As a U.S.
Senator and a
Presidential
candidate you
supported
reimportation
of
prescription
drugs.
Therefore, I
was shocked to
read in a July
7th article in
The Wall
Street Journal
that W. J.
"Billy"
Tauzin, the
chief lobbyist
for America's
pharmaceutical
industry,
stated he has
heard
"reassuring
words" from
White House
officials that
if the health
care bill
passes "the
cost savings
will be so
great that
reimportation
of U.S.
manufactured
prescription
drugs from
other
countries will
be
unnecessary."
(By Alicia
Mundy, "White
House Assures
Drug Makers on
Reimportation,"
WSJ,
July 7, 2009.)
For a number
of years the
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network (NRLN),
which
represents the
interests of
more than 2
million
retirees from
87 employers,
has urged
Congress to
pass
legislation to
allow
U.S.-licensed
pharmacies and
drug
wholesalers to
import
FDA-approved
medications
from Canada,
Europe,
Australia, New
Zealand and
Japan and pass
along the
savings to
their American
customers.
This would be
accomplished
by the
enactment of
the
"Pharmaceutical
Market Access
and Drug
Safety Act"
introduced by
Senators Byron
Dorgan and
Olympia Snowe
in March 2009.
I'm sure you
recall that
when you were
a Senator in
2006, you
co-sponsored
with Senator
David Vitter a
bill for the
reimportation
of
prescription
drugs.
Senator Vitter
was able to
get his
reimportation
prescription
drug plan
passed in the
Senate by a
55-36 vote
last week as
part of to the
bill funding
the Homeland
Security
Department.
Senate
Majority
Leader Harry
Reid also
voted for
Senator
Vitter's
plan. I think
this shows
there is broad
bi-partisan
support for
unlocking the
chains that
the U.S. drug
industry has
had around
American
consumers. I
hope you will
urge the
Conference
Committee to
keep the
reimportation
provision in
the bill.
If Mr. Tauzin
has received
reassuring
words from the
White House
that
reimportation
will be
unnecessary,
Mr. President,
you would be
ill advised to
break your
campaign
promise to
support
reimportation.
Giving the
drug companies
a pass on
competition
gives the
appearance
that industry
giant PhRMA,
the
Pharmaceutical
Research and
Manufacturers
of America,
has bought
itself out of
health care
reform
legislation
through its
commitment to
provide $80
billion in
health care
savings over
the next 10
years.
The
pharmaceutical
industry has
made the $80
billion in
promised
health care
savings sound
like a good
deal for
Americans.
However, even
if that $80
billion in
voluntary
savings could
be enforced,
it represents
less than 3
percent of the
projected
dollars that
Americans will
spend on drugs
during the
next 10
years. What
we had
understood to
be your
party's
legislative
agenda to
reduce drug
costs would
save far more
for both the
federal budget
and American
consumers,
especially
retirees.
Passing
legislation
for the
importation of
prescription
drugs from
FDA-approved
countries,
competitive
bidding by
makers of
prescription
drugs for
Medicare Part
D, funding the
FDA to reduce
generic drug
backlogs, and
stopping drug
companies from
making
contracts that
require
payoffs to
generic
manufacturers
who withhold
new generic
drugs from the
market would
produce a
savings for
Americans well
in excess of
the 3 percent.
I strongly
urge that you
ask Congress
to commission
a CBO study to
determine the
combined cost
savings
potential of
these
initiatives.
Also, please
ask the
Attorney
General to
stop the open
restraint of
trade
practiced
where brand
dug makers pay
generic drug
makers to hold
products from
the market
until patents
expire.
According to
an analysis by
the Washington
Post, PhRMA
was the health
care
industry's
biggest
spender on
lobbying in
the first
quarter of
2009 spending
$7 million and
employing 136
lobbyists,
including 49
former
government
staff
members.
Yielding to
Big PhRMA is
not the way to
bring the
change to
Washington
that you
promised
during your
Presidential
campaign.
News articles
about Mr.
Tauzin's
statements
that
reimportation
of
prescription
drugs will be
unnecessary
did not report
who in the
White House
provided the
alleged
assurance.
I'm requesting
that you
provide the
NRLN the name
of the White
House staff
member who met
with Mr.
Tauzin.
Please ask
that staff
person to meet
with Marta
Bascom, the
NRLN's
Executive
Director in
Washington,
DC, to discuss
reimportation
issues and
other ways to
reduce the
cost of
prescription
drugs. Marta
can be reached
on
703-863-9611.
Thank you for
taking the
time to
consider my
requests.
Sincerely,
Signed by
Bill Kadereit
President,
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRLN
Grassroots
Call To Action
- Health Care
Reform
Legislation
All
indications in
our nation's
capital are
that some form
of health care
reform
legislation
will be passed
this year. The
Congressional
timetable
appears to be
that bills
will be
introduced
this summer
and debated
and voted on
this fall.
It is now time
for the NRLN
Grassroots
Network
members to
demonstrate
they can be an
effective
force for
gaining the
attention of
and
influencing
members of
Congress. The
NRLN is asking
you to
immediately
call the state
or district
office of your
U.S. Senators
and
Representative
to request an
appointment to
meet with them
when they are
"back home"
during the
Memorial Day
"District Work
Period"
scheduled for
May 25 - 29.
You may do a
search for
your Senators'
and
Representative's
office phone
numbers either
by their name
or by your zip
code on the
NRLN website
at http://capwiz.com/abtr/dbq/officials/
. If you
search by your
zip code,
photos of your
elected
representatives
will appear.
Under the
photos of your
Senators and
Representative,
click on the
"info" option.
This will
present a
webpage with a
photo of your
lawmaker and a
number of
"tabs." Click
on the
"Contact" tab
and you will
access a
webpage
showing the
addresses and
phone numbers
for the
Washington, DC
and state
offices. Write
down the phone
number for the
state office
that is the
closest to
you.
When you call
that phone
number, inform
the staff
member that
you are
interested in
having a
one-on-one
meeting with
your elected
representative
to discuss
your position
on what should
be in health
care reform
legislation.
As you confirm
appointments,
please advise
me by email at
Rfjm9870@aol.com
so that I can
record it and
follow with
any added
support I can
provide; like
helping to get
others to join
you.
If an
appointment
for a personal
meeting is not
possible, ask
if the Senator
or
Representative
will be
conducting a
Town Hall
meeting in
your area. If
so, attend it,
ask questions
and make
comments based
on the NRLN's
Health Care
Reform Talking
Points
provided at
the end of
this email.
Also, try to
talk directly
with your
lawmaker
before or
after the Town
Hall meeting.
If Town Hall
meetings
aren't
scheduled, ask
for a meeting
with the
senior staff
member in that
office.
I encourage
you to print a
copy of the
Talking Points
at the end of
this message
and take them
to your
meeting with
your Senators
and
Representative
or senior
staff member
and leave the
copy with him
or her.
By meeting
with your
members of
Congress
during the May
25 - 29
period, you
will be
working to
shape the
future for
health care
reform in
America. It is
critical that
retirees have
a voice in
this process.
We will also
ask Grassroots
Network
members to
again engage
their elected
representatives
during the
Independence
Day recess on
June 29 - July
5. In
mid-September
we are
planning a
"Retiree
Health Care
Week" in
Washington,
DC. We will
ask
constituents
of key
Senators and
Representatives
involved with
health care
legislation to
come to
Capitol Hill
for meetings.
I would
appreciate
receiving an
email from you
after you have
met with your
Senators and
Representative.
Let me know
their name,
state/district
and a brief
summary of
what
transpired in
your meeting.
Send your
email to
Rfjm9870@aol.com.
Your
participation
in this "call
to action"
will be
greatly
appreciated.
Bob Martina,
Vice President
- Grassroots
Network
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
------------------------------------------------------------------
National
Retiree
Legislative
Network
Agenda on
Health Care
Reform
Legislation
• Please keep
retirees in
mind during
Congress'
deliberations
on health care
reform. Guard
against
harming
Medicare or
company-sponsored
health care
benefits that
retirees have
earned.
• Health care
reform
legislation
should prevent
broken
promises to
retirees by
providing what
the NRLN calls
a Maintenance
of Cost
Payment (MCP).
The MCP would
establish a
fixed monthly
payment to
retirees
equivalent to
the dollar
value of
benefits an
employer
provided at
retirement,
prior to the
reduction or
cancellation
of retirement
benefits such
as health
care,
prescription
drugs, life
insurance,
long-term
care,
catastrophic
coverage and
other
benefits. The
MCP would be
use to
purchase
replacement
coverage for
as much of the
lost benefits
as possible.
Under the
NRLN's
proposal,
companies
would be
entitled to
tax credits to
encourage them
to continue to
offer defined
benefit plans
or provide the
MCP.
• Don't tax
retirees for
the health
care benefits
they may still
receive from
their former
employer.
• Support the
NRLN's
position that
any health
care reform
bill developed
by Congress
should include
a Public Plan
Option.
• The NRLN's
vision of a
Public Plan
Option is
simply having
a portion of
an overall
health plan
offered
directly by
the
government,
just as the
Medicare plan
is today, to
compete with
plans offered
by private
insurance
companies.
• Building on
Medicare as
the Public
Plan Option is
the most cost
efficient way
to bring about
cost savings
without
overturning
the
expectations
and services
offered to the
44 million
people already
on Medicare.
• In short,
efficiencies
can be created
within the
current
Medicare
structure that
is not broken.
• The
government
should not own
clinics and
hospitals;
should not
exercise
control over
doctors nor
ration health
care.
• When an
employer
eliminates its
health care
plan, retirees
usually lose
"catastrophic
coverage"
which limits
out- of-pocket
medical
expenses to a
fixed amount,
such as
$1,500. Given
this loss, the
NRLN believes
that
catastrophic
coverage
should be
added to
Medicare.
• It is
difficult for
many men and
women age 50
to 64 who have
been laid off
or retired
early-either
forced or
voluntary-to
purchase
affordable
health care
insurance
because of
their age.
They should be
allowed to buy
into Medicare
at a cost that
does not
burden the
system.
• Funding
should be
provided in
health care
reform
legislation to
eliminate the
"doughnut
hole" in the
Medicare Part
D prescription
drug plan.
• If Congress
is serious
about reducing
health care
costs, it
should pass
bills that
already exist
that call for
importation of
prescription
drugs,
competitive
bidding by
makers of
prescription
drugs and
funding the
FDA to reduce
generic drug
backlogs; and
stopping drug
companies from
making payoffs
to generic
manufacturers
who withhold
new generic
drugs.
Go to
www.nrln.org
and click on
the link to
read the
NRLN's
complete
Legislative
Agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |